月球-地球时间的类别错误：为什么NASA无法同步不存在的东西
The Category Mistake of Cislunar Time: Why NASA Cannot Synchronize What Doesn't Exist
AI总结：
本文指出NASA的月球-地球时间计划基于哲学上的类别错误，提出通过双向原子相互作用替代单向时间分发来解决同步时间问题。
摘要：
2024年4月，白宫指示NASA在2026年12月前建立协调月球时间（LTC）。该计划假设通过在月球表面部署原子钟、计算相对论修正并经由LunaNet分发同步时间，可以建立统一的时间标准。本文认为，整个计划基于一个类别错误，即认为“同步时间”是客观存在的事物，可以独立存在并从权威来源传输到依赖接收者，但实际上它是一种认知构建：一种依赖观察者相对钟关系的模型相关表示。我们通过“单向时间前进”（FITO）假设、Spekkens的莱布尼茨操作主义、Wood-Spekkens精细调整论证以及客观与主观解释区别的视角，分析月球-地球时间计划。我们表明，同样的概念移动——区分什么是主观的，什么是客观的——也消除了月球-地球时间计划表面上的连贯性，并揭示其为一个建立在哲学混淆上的工程项目。我们提出了一个基于双向原子相互作用的交易替代方案，而非单向时间分发。
英文摘要：
In April 2024, the White House directed NASA to establish Coordinated Lunar Time (LTC) by December 2026. The programme assumes that a unified time standard can be constructed by deploying atomic clocks on the lunar surface, computing relativistic corrections, and distributing synchronized time via LunaNet. This paper argues that the entire enterprise rests on a category mistake in the sense introduced by Ryle and developed by Spekkens in quantum foundations: it treats "synchronized time" as an ontic entity -- something that exists independently and can be transmitted from authoritative sources to dependent receivers -- when it is in fact an epistemic construct: a model-dependent representation of observer-relative clock relationships. We analyze the cislunar time programme through the lens of Forward-In-Time-Only (FITO) assumptions, Spekkens' Leibnizian operationalism, the Wood-Spekkens fine-tuning argument, and the distinction between ontic and epistemic interpretations that has dissolved long-standing puzzles in quantum mechanics. We show that the same conceptual move that dissolves quantum "mysteries" -- recognizing what is epistemic versus what is ontic -- dissolves the apparent coherence of the cislunar time programme and reveals it as an engineering project built on a philosophical confusion. We sketch a transactional alternative grounded in bilateral atomic interactions rather than unidirectional time distribution.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
