arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.18521cs.LGcs.AI

AdaptStress: 在线自适应学习用于可解释和个性化压力预测的多变量和稀疏生理信号

AdaptStress: Online Adaptive Learning for Interpretable and Personalized Stress Prediction Using Multivariate and Sparse Physiological Signals

Engineering and Technology institute Groningen (ENTEG), University of Groningen(格罗宁根大学工程与技术学院(ENTEG));Department of Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen(格罗宁根大学医学中心人类运动科学系)

Xueyi Wang, Claudine J. C. Lamoth, Elisabeth Wilhelm

AI总结:

AdaptStress通过自适应学习和多变量生理信号预测压力,实现个性化和可解释的连续压力监测。

摘要:

连续压力预测可能有助于生活方式干预。本文提出了一种新颖、可解释且个性化的压力预测方法,利用智能手表的生理数据进行预测。我们开发了一个时间序列预测模型,利用多变量特征,包括心率变异性、活动模式和睡眠指标,来预测16个时间跨度(历史窗口:3、5、7、9天;预测窗口:1、3、5、7天)的压力水平。我们的评估涉及16名参与者,监测时间为10-15周。我们评估了我们的方法,与最先进的时间序列模型(Informer、TimesNet、PatchTST)和传统基线模型(CNN、LSTM、CNN-LSTM)在多个时间跨度上进行比较。在最优设置(5天输入,1天预测)下,我们的模型在MSE为0.053、MAE为0.190、RMSE为0.226的情况下表现优异。与基线模型的比较显示,我们的模型在所有条件下均优于TimesNet、PatchTST、CNN-LSTM、LSTM和CNN,分别比最佳基线提高了36.9%、25.5%和21.5%。根据可解释性分析,睡眠指标是最重要的和最一致的压力预测因子(重要性:1.1,一致性:0.9-1.0),而活动特征表现出高个体间变异性(0.1-0.2)。最值得注意的是,模型捕捉了个体特定的模式,相同特征在不同用户中可能产生相反效果,验证了其个性化能力。这些发现表明,消费者可穿戴设备结合自适应和可解释的深度学习,能够提供适应个体生理反应的压力评估,为现实世界中可扩展、连续、可解释的心理健康监测奠定了基础。

英文摘要:

Continuous stress forecasting could potentially contribute to lifestyle interventions. This paper presents a novel, explainable, and individualized approach for stress prediction using physiological data from consumer-grade smartwatches. We develop a time series forecasting model that leverages multivariate features, including heart rate variability, activity patterns, and sleep metrics, to predict stress levels across 16 temporal horizons (History window: 3, 5, 7, 9 days; forecasting window: 1, 3, 5, 7 days). Our evaluation involves 16 participants monitored for 10-15 weeks. We evaluate our approach across 16 participants, comparing against state-of-the-art time series models (Informer, TimesNet, PatchTST) and traditional baselines (CNN, LSTM, CNN-LSTM) across multiple temporal horizons. Our model achieved performance with an MSE of 0.053, MAE of 0.190, and RMSE of 0.226 in optimal settings (5-day input, 1-day prediction). A comparison with the baseline models shows that our model outperforms TimesNet, PatchTST, CNN-LSTM, LSTM, and CNN under all conditions, representing improvements of 36.9%, 25.5%, and 21.5% over the best baseline. According to the explanability analysis, sleep metrics are the most dominant and consistent stress predictors (importance: 1.1, consistency: 0.9-1.0), while activity features exhibit high inter-participant variability (0.1-0.2). Most notably, the model captures individual-specific patterns where identical features can have opposing effects across users, validating its personalization capabilities. These findings establish that consumer wearables, combined with adaptive and interpretable deep learning, can deliver relevant stress assessment adapted to individual physiological responses, providing a foundation for scalable, continuous, explainable mental health monitoring in real-world settings.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑