arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.18518cs.LGstat.MEstat.ML
收藏

利用机器学习辅助抽样和大语言模型标注测量违规内容的普及率

Measuring the Prevalence of Policy Violating Content with ML Assisted Sampling and LLM Labeling

Pinterest

Attila Dobi, Aravindh Manickavasagam, Benjamin Thompson, Xiaohan Yang, Faisal Farooq

AI总结:

本文提出了一种基于机器学习和大语言模型的系统,用于高效测量违反政策内容的普及率,通过概率抽样和多模态标注提升测量准确性。

摘要:

内容安全团队需要反映用户实际体验的指标,而不仅仅是报告的内容。我们研究普及率:在某一天内,用户观看(印象)中违反给定政策的内容所占的比例。准确测量普及率具有挑战性,因为违规内容往往罕见,且人工标注成本高,导致频繁、具有代表性的研究变得缓慢。我们提出了一种基于设计的测量系统,该系统(i)从印象流中每日抽取概率样本,使用机器学习辅助权重来集中标注预算在高曝光和高风险内容上,同时保持无偏性;(ii)使用受政策提示和黄金集验证的多模态大语言模型标注抽样内容;(iii)生成一致的普及率估计值,包括置信区间和仪表盘钻取功能。关键设计目标是单一全局样本支持多个维度:同一天的样本通过后分层估计支持普及率、观众地理、内容年龄和其他细分领域。我们描述了统计估计器、方差和置信区间构造、标签质量监控以及使系统在不同政策间可配置的工程工作流程。

英文摘要:

Content safety teams need metrics that reflect what users actually experience, not only what is reported. We study prevalence: the fraction of user views (impressions) that went to content violating a given policy on a given day. Accurate prevalence measurement is challenging because violations are often rare and human labeling is costly, making frequent, platform-representative studies slow. We present a design-based measurement system that (i) draws daily probability samples from the impression stream using ML-assisted weights to concentrate label budget on high-exposure and high-risk content while preserving unbiasedness, (ii) labels sampled items with a multimodal LLM governed by policy prompts and gold-set validation, and (iii) produces design-consistent prevalence estimates with confidence intervals and dashboard drilldowns. A key design goal is one global sample with many pivots: the same daily sample supports prevalence by surface, viewer geography, content age, and other segments through post-stratified estimation. We describe the statistical estimators, variance and confidence interval construction, label-quality monitoring, and an engineering workflow that makes the system configurable across policies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑