arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.15918cs.CVcs.AI

EarthSpatialBench: 多模态大语言模型在地球影像上空间推理能力的基准测试

EarthSpatialBench: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning Capabilities of Multimodal LLMs on Earth Imagery

University of Florida(佛罗里达大学);Indiana University Bloomington(印第安纳大学布卢明顿分校)

Zelin Xu, Yupu Zhang, Saugat Adhikari, Saiful Islam, Tingsong Xiao, Zibo Liu, Shigang Chen, Da Yan, Zhe Jiang

AI总结:

EarthSpatialBench是一个用于评估多模态大语言模型在地球影像上空间推理能力的综合基准测试,涵盖空间距离、方向、拓扑关系及复杂几何查询。

摘要:

对多模态大语言模型(MLLMs)的空间推理能力进行基准测试在计算机视觉中引起了越来越多的兴趣,因为其对于具身AI和其他需要与物理世界精确交互的代理系统具有重要意义。然而,地球影像上的空间推理却滞后于其他领域,因为它独特地涉及将对象定位在地理参考图像中,并利用视觉线索和向量几何坐标(例如2D边界框、折线和多边形)进行定量推理关于距离、方向和拓扑关系。现有的地球影像基准测试主要集中在2D空间定位、图像描述和粗略的空间关系(例如简单的方向或接近提示)。它们缺乏对定量方向和距离推理、系统性的拓扑关系以及超出边界框的复杂物体几何的系统支持。为填补这一空白,我们提出了EarthSpatialBench,一个用于评估MLLMs在地球影像上空间推理能力的综合基准测试。该基准测试包含超过325,000个问题-答案对,涵盖:(1)关于空间距离和方向的定性和定量推理;(2)系统性的拓扑关系;(3)单个物体查询、物体对查询和组合聚合组查询;以及(4)通过文本描述、视觉叠加和显式几何坐标表达的物体引用,包括2D边界框、折线和多边形。我们对开源和专有模型进行了广泛的实验,以识别MLLMs空间推理的限制。

英文摘要:

Benchmarking spatial reasoning in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has attracted growing interest in computer vision due to its importance for embodied AI and other agentic systems that require precise interaction with the physical world. However, spatial reasoning on Earth imagery has lagged behind, as it uniquely involves grounding objects in georeferenced images and quantitatively reasoning about distances, directions, and topological relations using both visual cues and vector geometry coordinates (e.g., 2D bounding boxes, polylines, and polygons). Existing benchmarks for Earth imagery primarily focus on 2D spatial grounding, image captioning, and coarse spatial relations (e.g., simple directional or proximity cues). They lack support for quantitative direction and distance reasoning, systematic topological relations, and complex object geometries beyond bounding boxes. To fill this gap, we propose \textbf{EarthSpatialBench}, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating spatial reasoning in MLLMs on Earth imagery. The benchmark contains over 325K question-answer pairs spanning: (1) qualitative and quantitative reasoning about spatial distance and direction; (2) systematic topological relations; (3) single-object queries, object-pair queries, and compositional aggregate group queries; and (4) object references expressed via textual descriptions, visual overlays, and explicit geometry coordinates, including 2D bounding boxes, polylines, and polygons. We conducted extensive experiments on both open-source and proprietary models to identify limitations in the spatial reasoning of MLLMs.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑