arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.14331cs.GTcs.HCecon.TH
收藏

人机协作的贝叶斯框架:互补性与相关性忽视

A Bayesian Framework for Human-AI Collaboration: Complementarity and Correlation Neglect

MIT(麻省理工学院);Northwestern University(西北大学)

Saurabh Amin, Amine Bennouna, Daniel Huttenlocher, Dingwen Kong, Liang Lyu, Asuman Ozdaglar

AI总结:

本文提出一个贝叶斯框架,研究人类与AI协作中信息重叠和相关性忽视对决策的影响,分析了增强、损害、互补性和自动化等交互模式。

摘要:

我们开发了一个决策理论模型,研究AI辅助何时会提高或损害人类决策质量。人类决策者观察到私人信息并接收AI系统的建议,但可能不完美地结合这些信号。我们证明AI辅助的影响可以分解为两个主要因素:AI提供的信息价值,以及人类如何使用AI建议带来的行为扭曲。我们分析的核心是人类与AI知识之间信息重叠的微观基础度量。我们研究了一种实际相关的不完美决策形式——相关性忽视,即人类将AI建议视为与自身信息独立,尽管有共同证据。在该模型中,我们刻画了信息重叠和AI能力如何塑造人类与AI交互的领域,包括增强、损害、互补性和自动化,并得出关键见解。

英文摘要:

We develop a decision-theoretic model of human-AI interaction to study when AI assistance improves or impairs human decision-making. A human decision-maker observes private information and receives a recommendation from an AI system, but may combine these signals imperfectly. We show that the effect of AI assistance decomposes into two main forces: the marginal informational value of the AI beyond what the human already knows, and a behavioral distortion arising from how the human uses the AI's recommendation. Central to our analysis is a micro-founded measure of informational overlap between human and AI knowledge. We study an empirically relevant form of imperfect decision-making -- correlation neglect -- whereby humans treat AI recommendations as independent of their own information despite shared evidence. Under this model, we characterize how overlap and AI capabilities shape the Human-AI interaction regime between augmentation, impairment, complementarity, and automation, and draw key insights.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑