arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.13635stat.ME
收藏

粒子滤波器中的反向平滑与固定滞后平滑

Backward Smoothing versus Fixed-Lag Smoothing in Particle Filters

Tokyo University of Marine Science and Techonology(东京海洋大学);The Institute of Statistical Mathematics(统计数学研究所)

Genshiro Kitagawa

AI总结:

本文比较了粒子滤波器中反向平滑与固定滞后平滑的精度与计算成本,发现FFBS和FFBSm在固定粒子数下表现更优,而固定滞后平滑在计算时间相等时更准确。

摘要:

粒子平滑能够在非线性和非高斯状态空间模型中实现状态估计,但其实际应用常受到高计算成本的限制。反向平滑方法,如前向滤波后向平滑器(FFBS)及其边际形式(FFBSm)可以实现高精度,但通常需要粒子数量的二次计算复杂度。本文通过趋势估计示例,探讨了粒子平滑方法的精度与计算成本的权衡。在高斯和重尾(柯西型)系统噪声下,比较了固定滞后平滑、FFBS和FFBSm,特别关注基于子采样和局部邻域限制的FFBSm的O(m)近似。结果表明,在固定粒子数量下,FFBS和FFBSm优于固定滞后平滑,而固定滞后平滑在相等计算时间内往往具有更高的精度。此外,高效的FFBSm近似在高斯转移中有效,但在重尾动态中效果减弱。

英文摘要:

Particle smoothing enables state estimation in nonlinear and non-Gaussian state-space models, but its practical use is often limited by high computational cost. Backward smoothing methods such as the Forward Filter Backward Smoother (FFBS) and its marginal form (FFBSm) can achieve high accuracy, yet typically require quadratic computational complexity in the number of particles. This paper examines the accuracy--computational cost trade-offs of particle smoothing methods through a trend-estimation example. Fixed-lag smoothing, FFBS, and FFBSm are compared under Gaussian and heavy-tailed (Cauchy-type) system noise, with particular attention to O(m) approximations of FFBSm based on subsampling and local neighborhood restrictions. The results show that FFBS and FFBSm outperform fixed-lag smoothing at a fixed particle number, while fixed-lag smoothing often achieves higher accuracy under equal computational time. Moreover, efficient FFBSm approximations are effective for Gaussian transitions but become less advantageous for heavy-tailed dynamics.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑