arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.09254cs.HCcs.CY
收藏

探究中国智能家庭应用中的旁观者隐私

Investigating Bystander Privacy in Chinese Smart Home Apps

King’s College London(伦敦国王学院);University of St Andrews(圣安德鲁斯大学);University of Warwick(华威大学);INGENIO (CSIC-Universitat Politècnica de València)(INGENIO(西班牙国家研究委员会-巴伦西亚理工大学))

Shijing He, Xuchen Wang, Yaxiong Lei, Chi Zhang, Ruba Abu-Salma, Jose Such

AI总结:

本研究分析了中国49款智能家庭应用的隐私政策与实践,发现旁观者隐私保护不足,提出改进隐私透明度和可信度的设计建议。

摘要:

在西方语境中,智能家庭中的旁观者隐私问题已被广泛研究,但在非西方国家如中国仍鲜有探讨。本研究采用混合方法分析了49款中国智能家庭应用,包括隐私政策审查、用户体验/界面评估以及苹果应用商店隐私标签的评估。尽管大多数应用名义上符合国家规定,但我们发现书面政策与实际实施之间存在显著差距。我们的可追溯分析突显了数据控制的一致性问题以及数据共享实践的透明度不足。关键的是,旁观者隐私——特别是对于访客和非用户个体——在政策文件和界面设计中几乎不存在。此外,隐私标签与实际数据实践之间的差异威胁到用户信任并削弱知情同意。我们提供了设计建议,以加强旁观者保护,改进以隐私为导向的UI透明度,并提高隐私标签的可信度,支持非西方语境下包容性智能家庭生态系统的开发。

英文摘要:

Bystander privacy in smart homes has been widely studied in Western contexts, yet it remains underexplored in non-Western countries such as China. In this study, we analyze 49 Chinese smart home apps using a mixed-methods approach, including privacy policy review, UX/UI evaluation, and assessment of Apple App Store privacy labels. While most apps nominally comply with national regulations, we identify significant gaps between written policies and actual implementation. Our traceability analysis highlights inconsistencies in data controls and a lack of transparency in data-sharing practices. Crucially, bystander privacy -- particularly for visitors and non-user individuals -- is largely absent from both policy documents and interface design. Additionally, discrepancies between privacy labels and actual data practices threaten user trust and undermine informed consent. We provide design recommendations to strengthen bystander protections, improve privacy-oriented UI transparency, and enhance the credibility of privacy labels, supporting the development of inclusive smart home ecosystems in non-Western contexts.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑