arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.09202cs.CYcs.AIcs.HCcs.SYeess.SY
收藏

算法灭绝在加沙:人工智能、反制责任与公共话语的腐败

Genocide by Algorithm in Gaza: Artificial Intelligence, Countervailing Responsibility, and the Corruption of Public Discourse

Aula Fellowship for AI(奥拉人工智能奖学金项目)

Branislav Radeljic

AI总结:

本文探讨人工智能在加沙战争中的角色,分析其作为认知基础设施对暴力的分类与合法化,并呼吁通过民主化AI伦理来对抗算法暴力。

摘要:

人工智能军事化加速转变了战争的伦理、政治和治理。本文探讨人工智能驱动的瞄准系统如何作为认知基础设施,对暴力进行分类、合法化和执行,以以色列在加沙的行为为例。通过责任的视角,本文考察三个相互关联的维度:(a)政治责任,探讨国家如何利用人工智能加速战争同时逃避问责;(b)专业责任,针对技术专家、工程师和国防承包商在数据武器化中的参与;(c)个人责任,探讨参与或抵制算法治理的个人道德代理。此外,本文还考察了公共话语参与者的位置和影响,其叙述往往掩盖或正常化人工智能赋能的暴力。加沙案例揭示人工智能并非中性工具,而是殖民等级制的再生产者和暴行的正常化者。最终,本文呼吁在自动化战争时代重新界定技术代理和问责。结论认为,对抗算法暴力需要人工智能伦理的民主化,这需要抵制技术官僚的宿命论,并关注受高科技军事主义影响最深的人群的现实生活。

英文摘要:

The accelerating militarization of artificial intelligence has transformed the ethics, politics, and governance of warfare. This article interrogates how AI-driven targeting systems function as epistemic infrastructures that classify, legitimize, and execute violence, using Israel's conduct in Gaza as a paradigmatic case. Through the lens of responsibility, the article examines three interrelated dimensions: (a) political responsibility, exploring how states exploit AI to accelerate warfare while evading accountability; (b) professional responsibility, addressing the complicity of technologists, engineers, and defense contractors in the weaponization of data; and (c) personal responsibility, probing the moral agency of individuals who participate in or resist algorithmic governance. This is complemented by an examination of the position and influence of those participating in public discourse, whose narratives often obscure or normalize AI-enabled violence. The Gaza case reveals AI not as a neutral instrument but as an active participant in the reproduction of colonial hierarchies and the normalization of atrocity. Ultimately, the paper calls for a reframing of technological agency and accountability in the age of automated warfare. It concludes that confronting algorithmic violence demands a democratization of AI ethics, one that resists technocratic fatalism and centers the lived realities of those most affected by high-tech militarism.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑