arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.08873cs.IRcs.AIcs.CYcs.SIphysics.soc-ph
收藏

谁的名字出现?II:基于基准测试和干预审计的LLM学者推荐系统

Whose Name Comes Up? II: Benchmarking and Intervention-Based Auditing of LLM-Based Scholar Recommendation

Complexity Science Hub Vienna(维也纳复杂性科学中心);Universitat Politècnica de València(巴塞罗那理工大学);Inria Rennes(里昂国家信息与自动化研究所)

Lisette Espín-Noboa, Gonzalo Gabriel Méndez

AI总结:

提出LLMScholarBench基准,通过温度变化、表示约束提示和检索增强生成等干预措施审计22个LLM在物理专家推荐中的技术质量和社会代表性,发现干预措施带来不同权衡。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLM)现在被用于学术专家推荐。现有的审计通常孤立地评估此类推荐,忽略了最终用户的推理时干预。因此,尚不清楚失败(例如,拒绝、幻觉、覆盖不均)源于模型选择还是部署决策。我们引入了LLMScholarBench,一个用于审计基于LLM的学者推荐的基准,它联合评估模型基础设施和最终用户在多个任务上的干预。LLMScholarBench使用九个指标衡量技术质量和社会代表性。我们在物理专家推荐中实例化该基准,并在温度变化、表示约束提示和通过网络搜索的检索增强生成(RAG)下审计22个LLM。我们的结果表明,每种干预都带来不同的权衡。较高的温度会降低有效性、一致性和事实性。表示约束提示以提高多样性为代价降低了事实性,而RAG主要提高了技术质量,同时降低了多样性和平等性。总体而言,最终用户的干预重塑了权衡,而不是提供统一的收益。LLMScholarBench使得在基于LLM的学者推荐中,跨模型和干预的所有这些动态都可审计。

英文摘要:

Large language models (LLMs) are now used for academic expert recommendation. Existing audits typically evaluate such recommendations in isolation, ignoring end-user inference-time interventions. Thus, it remains unclear whether failures (e.g., refusals, hallucinations, uneven coverage) stem from model choice or deployment decisions. We introduce LLMScholarBench, a benchmark for auditing LLM-based scholar recommendation that jointly evaluates model infrastructure and end-user interventions across multiple tasks. LLMScholarBench measures technical quality and social representation using nine metrics. We instantiate the benchmark in physics expert recommendation and audit 22 LLMs under temperature variation, representation-constrained prompting, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) via web search. Our results show that each intervention entails distinct tradeoffs. Higher temperature degrades validity, consistency, and factuality. Representation-constrained prompting improves diversity at the expense of factuality, while RAG primarily improves technical quality while reducing diversity and parity. Overall, end-user interventions reshape trade-offs rather than providing uniform gains. LLMScholarBench makes all these dynamics auditable across models and interventions in LLM-based scholar recommendations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑