arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.08336cs.CLcs.CV
收藏

从推理到像素:统一多模态模型中对齐差距的基准测试

UReason: Benchmarking Reasoning-to-Generation Alignment in Unified Multimodal Models

University of California San Diego(加利福尼亚大学圣迭戈分校);University of Southern California(南加利福尼亚大学);University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign(伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校);Carnegie Mellon University(卡内基梅隆大学)

Cheng Yang, Chufan Shi, Bo Shui, Yaokang Wu, Muzi Tao, Huijuan Wang, Ivan Yee Lee, Yong Liu, Xuezhe Ma, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick

AI总结:

本文通过UReason基准测试,探讨统一多模态模型中模态对齐问题,发现去上下文生成在图像生成任务中表现更优,揭示了文本推理与生成图像之间存在对齐差距。

摘要:

统一多模态模型(UMMs)旨在在一个统一架构中整合多模态理解和生成,但其跨模态表示对齐程度尚不明确。为此,我们使用推理引导的图像生成作为诊断任务,模型先生成文本推理再生成图像。我们引入UReason基准测试,包含2000个手工整理的实例,涵盖代码、算术、空间、属性和文本五大推理密集型任务。为实现受控分析,我们开发了评估框架,比较直接生成、推理引导生成和去上下文生成三种方法,仅依赖从推理中提取的精炼提示。在八个广泛使用的UMMs中,尽管推理引导生成优于直接生成,但去上下文生成在图像生成任务中始终以较大优势胜出。我们的结果表明,文本推理中的预期视觉语义在生成图像中并不可靠。这表明,尽管具有统一设计和训练,当前UMMs在跨模态表示对齐方面仍不稳健。总体而言,UReason为跨模态对齐提供了实用的检测测试,并为开发下一代更紧密对齐的UMMs提供了具有挑战性的基准测试。

英文摘要:

Unified multimodal models (UMMs) aim to integrate multimodal understanding and generation within a unified architecture, yet it remains unclear to what extent textual and visual modalities are aligned. To investigate this question, we use reasoning-guided image generation as a diagnostic task, where models produce textual reasoning first and then generate images. We introduce UReason, a benchmark for evaluating reasoning-to-generation alignment in this paradigm, consisting of 2,000 human-curated and human-verified instances spanning five reasoning-intensive tasks: Code, Arithmetic, Spatial, Attribute, and Text. To enable controlled analysis, we develop an evaluation framework that compares direct generation, reasoning-guided generation, and decontextualized generation, which conditions only on the refined prompt extracted from reasoning. Across eight widely used open-source UMMs, while we find that reasoning-guided generation yields improvements over direct generation, somewhat surprisingly, decontextualized generation consistently outperforms reasoning-guided generation by a large margin. Our further analyses suggest that the intended visual semantics in textual reasoning are not reliably reflected in the generated images, despite their unified design and training. Overall, UReason serves as a practical litmus test for reasoning-to-generation alignment and provides a challenging benchmark for developing next-generation, more tightly aligned UMMs.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑