arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.07992cs.LGstat.ML
收藏

何时可以通过可验证奖励进行组合推理学习?

When Is Compositional Reasoning Learnable from Verifiable Rewards?

Weizmann Institute of Science(魏茨曼科学研究院);Hebrew University of Jerusalem(耶路撒冷希伯来大学)

Daniel Barzilai, Yotam Wolf, Ronen Basri

AI总结:

本文研究了通过可验证奖励强化学习学习组合推理的可学习性,提出了任务优势比率的概念,并分析了其在不同任务中的表现及影响因素。

摘要:

大型语言模型通过可验证奖励的强化学习(RLVR)中出现组合推理已成为近期经验成功的关键驱动力。尽管取得了进展,但仍然不清楚哪些组合问题可以在这种设置中仅使用结果层面的反馈进行学习。在本工作中,我们从理论上研究了在RLVR训练下自回归模型中组合问题的可学习性。我们识别了一个量,称为任务优势比率,这是组合问题和基础模型的联合属性,它表征了哪些任务和组合可以从结果层面的反馈中学习。积极的一面是,利用这一特征,我们证明了当正确的中间步骤提供明显优势时,组合问题可以通过RLVR高效学习。我们还分析了这种优势如何在不同问题中自然出现。消极的一面是,当结构优势不存在时,RLVR可能会收敛到次优的组合。我们证明,在某些情况下,基础模型的质量决定了这种优势是否存在以及RLVR是否会收敛到次优解。我们希望我们的分析可以提供一个原则性的理论理解,说明何时以及为什么RLVR成功以及何时不成功。

英文摘要:

The emergence of compositional reasoning in large language models through reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has been a key driver of recent empirical successes. Despite this progress, it remains unclear which compositional problems are learnable in this setting using outcome-level feedback alone. In this work, we theoretically study the learnability of compositional problems in autoregressive models under RLVR training. We identify a quantity that we call the task-advantage ratio, a joint property of the compositional problem and the base model, that characterizes which tasks and compositions are learnable from outcome-level feedback. On the positive side, using this characterization, we show that compositional problems where correct intermediate steps provide a clear advantage are efficiently learnable with RLVR. We also analyze how such an advantage naturally arises in different problems. On the negative side, when the structural advantage is not present, RLVR may converge to suboptimal compositions. We prove that, in some cases, the quality of the base model determines if such an advantage exists and whether RLVR will converge to a suboptimal solution. We hope our analysis can provide a principled theoretical understanding of when and why RLVR succeeds and when it does not.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑