arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.07973cs.LG
收藏

通过利用表示空间来改进神经符号学习

On Improving Neurosymbolic Learning by Exploiting the Representation Space

University of Pennsylvania(宾夕法尼亚大学);Huawei Labs(华为实验室)

Aaditya Naik, Efthymia Tsamoura, Shibo Jin, Mayur Naik, Dan Roth

AI总结:

CLIPPER通过利用表示空间修剪技术提升神经符号学习性能,显著提高Scallop、Dolphin和ISED等引擎的准确率。

摘要:

我们研究了在神经符号设置中学习神经分类器的问题,其中输入实例的隐藏黄金标签必须满足一个逻辑公式。在该设置中学习的过程是首先计算(一部分)满足公式的标签组合,然后使用这些组合和分类器的得分计算损失。一个挑战是标签组合的空间会呈指数增长,使学习变得困难。我们提出了一种技术,通过利用实例具有相似潜在表示时很可能共享相同标签的直觉来修剪这个空间。虽然这一直觉已被广泛用于弱监督学习,但将其应用于我们的设置具有挑战性,因为逻辑约束会引入标签依赖性。我们将修剪过程公式化为一个整数线性规划问题,以删除不一致的标签组合,同时保持逻辑结构。我们的方法CLIPPER与现有训练算法正交,并可以无缝集成其中。在16个复杂的神经符号任务基准上,我们证明CLIPPER能够将最先进的神经符号引擎如Scallop、Dolphin和ISED的性能提升高达48%、53%和8%,从而达到最先进的准确率。

英文摘要:

We study the problem of learning neural classifiers in a neurosymbolic setting where the hidden gold labels of input instances must satisfy a logical formula. Learning in this setting proceeds by first computing (a subset of) the possible combinations of labels that satisfy the formula and then computing a loss using those combinations and the classifiers' scores. One challenge is that the space of label combinations can grow exponentially, making learning difficult. We propose a technique that prunes this space by exploiting the intuition that instances with similar latent representations are likely to share the same label. While this intuition has been widely used in weakly supervised learning, its application in our setting is challenging due to label dependencies imposed by logical constraints. We formulate the pruning process as an integer linear program that discards inconsistent label combinations while respecting logical structure. Our approach, CLIPPER, is orthogonal to existing training algorithms and can be seamlessly integrated with them. Across 16 benchmarks over complex neurosymbolic tasks, we demonstrate that CLIPPER boosts the performance of state-of-the-art neurosymbolic engines like Scallop, Dolphin, and ISED by up to 48%, 53%, and 8%, leading to state-of-the-art accuracies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑