arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.06334astro-ph.COastro-ph.IM
收藏

利用点源表征SPT-3G的偏振波束响应

Characterization of the Polarization Beam Response of SPT-3G Using Point Sources

Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies (IPNS), High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)(高能加速器研究机构粒子核研究研究所);International Center for Quantum-field Measurement Systems for Studies of the Universe and Particles (WPI-QUP), High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)(高能加速器研究机构宇宙与粒子研究量子场测量系统国际中心);University of Chicago(芝加哥大学);Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of Chicago(芝加哥大学卡弗里宇宙物理学研究所);University of California, Berkeley(加州大学伯克利分校);Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory(费米国家加速实验室);University of Melbourne(墨尔本大学);Sorbonne Université(索邦大学);Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris(巴黎天体物理研究所);University of New Mexico(新墨西哥大学);Cardiff University(卡迪夫大学)
T. de Haan, M. Archipley, N. Huang, A. J. Anderson, B. Ansarinejad, L. Balkenhol, D. R. Barron, K. Benabed, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Blee… 展开作者

T. de Haan, M. Archipley, N. Huang, A. J. Anderson, B. Ansarinejad, L. Balkenhol, D. R. Barron, K. Benabed, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, S. Bocquet, F. R. Bouchet, L. Bryant, E. Camphuis, M. G. Campitiello, J. E. Carlstrom, J. Carron, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, P. M. Chichura, A. Chokshi, T. -L. Chou, A. Coerver, T. M. Crawford, C. Daley, K. R. Dibert, M. A. Dobbs, M. Doohan, A. Doussot, D. Dutcher, W. Everett, C. Feng, K. R. Ferguson, N. C. Ferree, K. Fichman, A. Foster, S. Galli, A. E. Gambrel, R. W. Gardner, F. Ge, N. Goeckner-Wald, R. Gualtieri, F. Guidi, S. Guns, N. W. Halverson, E. Hivon, A. Y. Q. Ho, G. P. Holder, W. L. Holzapfel, J. C. Hood, A. Hryciuk, F. Keruzore, A. R. Khalife, L. Knox, M. Korman, K. Kornoelje, C. -L. Kuo, K. Levy, Y. Li, A. E. Lowitz, C. Lu, G. P. Lynch, T. J. Maccarone, A. S. Maniyar, E. S. Martsen, F. Menanteau, M. Millea, J. Montgomery, Y. Nakato, T. Natoli, G. I. Noble, Y. Omori, A. Ouellette, Z. Pan, P. Paschos, K. A. Phadke, A. W. Pollak, K. Prabhu, W. Quan, M. Rahimi, A. Rahlin, C. L. Reichardt, M. Rouble, J. E. Ruhl, E. Schiappucci, A. C. Silva Oliveira, A. Simpson, J. A. Sobrin, A. A. Stark, J. Stephen, C. Tandoi, B. Thorne, C. Trendafilova, C. Umilta, J. D. Vieira, A. G. Vieregg, A. Vitrier, Y. Wan, N. Whitehorn, W. L. K. Wu, M. R. Young, J. A. Zebrowski

AI总结:

通过观测100个明亮河外点源,直接测量SPT-3G在95、150和220 GHz三个频段的偏振波束响应,得到β_pol值,表明旁瓣去极化最小,并与先前宇宙学分析结果存在1.3σ差异。

摘要:

精确测量宇宙微波背景(CMB)偏振需要对仪器系统效应进行严格控制。对于南极望远镜的第三代相机(SPT-3G),它在95、150和220 GHz三个频段进行观测,准确的波束表征对于解释偏振毫米波天空至关重要。我们通过观测100个明亮的河外点源,直接测量了SPT-3G的偏振波束响应。先前的SPT-3G功率谱分析引入了一个唯象参数$\beta_{\rm pol}$来描述波束旁瓣中保留的偏振,并发现由于频率间偏振功率谱一致性要求而存在显著去极化。我们的直接测量得到95 GHz处$\beta_{\rm pol}=0.89\pm0.10$,150 GHz处$1.08\pm0.10$,220 GHz处$0.90\pm0.22$,表明旁瓣去极化最小。我们通过后验采样与自助重采样、实空间与傅里叶空间分析、温度到偏振泄漏处理、协方差确定和源选择等系统测试验证了这些结果。与先前宇宙学分析推断的值相比,我们的结果相差有效$1.3\sigma$。这种明显差异是模型依赖的,因为点源分析的$\beta_{\rm pol}$约束能力主要来自比功率谱分析更高的多极矩。因此,这些测量为功率谱分析中观测到的频率依赖残差提供了三种解释:统计涨落、需要更复杂的偏振波束模型,或波束去极化之外的其他系统效应。

英文摘要:

Precise measurements of cosmic microwave background (CMB) polarization require rigorous control of instrumental systematics. For the South Pole Telescope's third-generation camera (SPT-3G), which observes in three bands centered near 95, 150, and 220 GHz, accurate beam characterization is critical for interpreting the polarized mm-wave sky. We present direct measurements of SPT-3G's polarized beam response from observations of 100 bright extragalactic point sources. Previous SPT-3G power spectrum analyses introduced a phenomenological parameter, $β_{\rm pol}$, to describe the polarization preserved in beam sidelobes, and found evidence for significant depolarization from the requirement of inter-frequency polarization power spectrum consistency. Our direct measurements yield $β_{\rm pol}=0.89\pm0.10$ at 95 GHz, $1.08\pm0.10$ at 150 GHz, and $0.90\pm0.22$ at 220 GHz, indicating minimal sidelobe depolarization. We validate these results with systematic tests of posterior sampling versus bootstrap resampling, real-space versus Fourier-space analysis, temperature-to-polarization leakage handling, covariance determination, and source selection. Compared to values inferred from previous cosmological analyses, our results differ by an effective $1.3σ$. This apparent discrepancy is model dependent, because the point source analysis derives much of its $β_{\rm pol}$ constraining power from higher multipoles than the power spectrum analysis. These measurements therefore admit three explanations for the frequency-dependent residuals observed in the power spectrum analysis: a statistical fluctuation, the need for more sophisticated polarized beam models, or systematics other than beam depolarization.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑