arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.05856cs.HC
收藏

它说话像病人,但感觉不同:与医学学习者共同设计AI标准化病人

"It Talks Like a Patient, But Feels Different": Co-Designing AI Standardized Patients with Medical Learners

The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen(香港中文大学(深圳));Nankai University(南开大学);The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou)(香港科技大学(广州));Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam(阿姆斯特丹自由大学);MIT Media Lab, MIT(麻省理工学院媒体实验室)

Zhiqi Gao, Guo Zhu, Huarui Luo, Dongyijie Primo Pan, Haoming Tang, Bingquan Zhang, Jiahuan Pei, Jie Li, Benyou Wang

AI总结:

本文探讨了AI标准化病人在医学沟通培训中的应用,通过调研发现学习者对AI-SP的期望,并提出以学习者为中心的设计需求,强调教学实用性而非对话真实性的重要性。

摘要:

标准化病人(SPs)在临床沟通培训中起核心作用,但成本高、难以扩展且不一致。基于大型语言模型(LLM)的AI标准化病人(AI-SPs)提供了灵活、按需的练习方式,但学习者常反馈AI-SP说话像病人但感觉不同。我们采访了12名临床年医学学生,并进行了三次协同设计工作坊,探讨学习者在SP互动中的限制以及对AI-SP的期望。我们识别出六个以学习者为中心的需求,将其转化为AI-SP设计要求,并综合出一个概念流程。我们的发现将AI-SPs定位为有意识练习的工具,并表明教学实用性而非对话真实性单独驱动学习者的信任、参与和教育价值。

英文摘要:

Standardized patients (SPs) play a central role in clinical communication training but are costly, difficult to scale, and inconsistent. Large language model (LLM) based AI standardized patients (AI-SPs) promise flexible, on-demand practice, yet learners often report that they talk like a patient but feel different. We interviewed 12 clinical-year medical students and conducted three co-design workshops to examine how learners experience constraints of SP encounters and what they expect from AI-SPs. We identified six learner-centered needs, translated them into AI-SP design requirements, and synthesized a conceptual workflow. Our findings position AI-SPs as tools for deliberate practice and show that instructional usability, rather than conversational realism alone, drives learner trust, engagement, and educational value.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑