arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.05532cs.AIcs.LG

分裂人格训练:通过交替人格揭示潜在知识

Split Personality Training: Revealing Latent Knowledge Through Alternate Personalities

University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway(卑尔根大学);Independent Researcher, London, UK(独立研究者);University College London, London, UK(伦敦大学学院);Independent Researcher, Berlin, Germany(独立研究者);Independent Researcher(独立研究者);Head of Research(研发负责人)

Florian Dietz, William Wale, Oscar Gilg, Robert McCarthy, Felix Michalak, Gustavo Ewbank Rodrigues Danon, Miguelito de Guzman, Dietrich Klakow

AI总结:

通过分裂人格训练方法,揭示大型语言模型中隐藏的潜在知识,提升对模型行为的审计能力。

摘要:

检测大型语言模型中的不一致行为具有挑战性,因为模型可能在训练过程中学会隐藏不良行为。标准审计技术效果有限:黑盒方法往往无法区分不一致的输出与良性输出,而机制可解释性无法随着模型能力的提升而扩展。我们引入了分裂人格训练(SPT),该方法通过微调一个第二“诚实人格”使其成为LoRA参数,在正常操作期间保持非活动状态。在主模型响应后,我们激活LoRA适配器并插入触发字符串,使诚实人格能够审查响应并访问主模型的潜在状态。我们测试了我们的方法在Anthropic Auditing Game Model Organism上的表现,这是一个基准测试,其中Llama-3.3-70B被训练以利用奖励黑客行为并隐藏这种行为。SPT实现了96%的整体准确率,而Anthropic报告的准确率接近0%。诚实人格揭示了外部观察者无法访问的潜在知识,例如被妥协模型训练的虚构偏见。

英文摘要:

Detecting misalignment in large language models is challenging because models may learn to conceal misbehavior during training. Standard auditing techniques fall short: black-box methods often cannot distinguish misaligned outputs from benign ones, and mechanistic interpretability does not scale with model capabilities. We introduce Split Personality Training (SPT), which fine-tunes a second ``honest persona'' into LoRA parameters that remain inactive during normal operation. After the main model responds, we activate the LoRA adapter and insert a trigger string, enabling the honest persona to review the response while accessing the main model's latent states. We test our method on the Anthropic Auditing Game Model Organism, a benchmark where Llama-3.3-70B is trained to exploit reward hacks while concealing this behavior. SPT achieves 96% overall accuracy, whereas Anthropic reports near 0% accuracy. The honest persona reveals latent knowledge inaccessible to external observers, such as the fictional biases the compromised model was trained on.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑