arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.04570cs.CL
收藏

大语言模型能否捕捉到稳定的人生成句子熵度量?

Can LLMs capture stable human-generated sentence entropy measures?

Ludwig Maximilian University(路德维希·马克西米利安大学);Technical University of Munich(慕尼黑工业大学)

Estrella Pivel-Villanueva, Elisabeth Frederike Sterner, Franziska Knolle

AI总结:

研究通过实验证明大语言模型在捕捉人类生成句子熵方面的能力,发现GPT-4o与人类数据最一致,但LLMs无法完全替代稳定的人类分布。

摘要:

预测接下来的词语是语言理解的核心机制,可能通过香农熵来量化。目前尚无实证共识,即需要多少人的回应才能获得在词语层面稳定且无偏的熵估计。此外,大型语言模型(LLMs)越来越多地被用作人类规范数据的替代品,但它们能否再现稳定的人类熵仍不清楚。在此,我们使用两个大型公开可用的填空数据集(德语1和英语2)来解决这两个问题。我们实现了基于自助法的收敛分析,追踪熵估计如何随着样本量变化而稳定。在两种语言中,超过97%的句子在可用的样本量内达到了稳定的熵估计。在德语中,90%的句子在111次回应后收敛,英语中为81次回应,而低熵句子(<1)仅需20次回应,高熵句子(>2.5)则需要更多。这些发现为常见的规范实践提供了首次直接的实证验证,并证明了收敛在很大程度上依赖于句子可预测性。然后,我们将稳定的的人类熵值与从几种LLMs(包括GPT-4o)中提取的熵估计进行比较,包括基于对数几率的概率提取和基于采样的频率估计,GPT2-xl/german-GPT-2、RoBERTa Base/GottBERT、LLaMA 2 7B Chat。GPT-4o在人类数据中显示出最高的一致性,尽管一致性强烈依赖于提取方法和提示设计。基于对数几率的估计最小化了绝对误差,而基于采样的估计在捕捉人类变异的分散性方面更优。总之,我们的结果为人类规范实践建立了实用指南,并表明尽管LLMs可以近似人类熵,但它们不能与稳定的人类衍生分布互换。

英文摘要:

Predicting upcoming words is a core mechanism of language comprehension and may be quantified using Shannon entropy. There is currently no empirical consensus on how many human responses are required to obtain stable and unbiased entropy estimates at the word level. Moreover, large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as substitutes for human norming data, yet their ability to reproduce stable human entropy remains unclear. Here, we address both issues using two large publicly available cloze datasets in German 1 and English 2. We implemented a bootstrap-based convergence analysis that tracks how entropy estimates stabilize as a function of sample size. Across both languages, more than 97% of sentences reached stable entropy estimates within the available sample sizes. 90% of sentences converged after 111 responses in German and 81 responses in English, while low-entropy sentences (<1) required as few as 20 responses and high-entropy sentences (>2.5) substantially more. These findings provide the first direct empirical validation for common norming practices and demonstrate that convergence critically depends on sentence predictability. We then compared stable human entropy values with entropy estimates derived from several LLMs, including GPT-4o, using both logit-based probability extraction and sampling-based frequency estimation, GPT2-xl/german-GPT-2, RoBERTa Base/GottBERT, and LLaMA 2 7B Chat. GPT-4o showed the highest correspondence with human data, although alignment depended strongly on the extraction method and prompt design. Logit-based estimates minimized absolute error, whereas sampling-based estimates were better in capturing the dispersion of human variability. Together, our results establish practical guidelines for human norming and show that while LLMs can approximate human entropy, they are not interchangeable with stable human-derived distributions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑