arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.04068cs.LGcs.DB

道路网络中学习距离索引的实证调查与基准测试

An Empirical Survey and Benchmark of Learned Distance Indexes for Road Networks

Purdue University(普渡大学)

Gautam Choudhary, Libin Zhou, Yeasir Rayhan, Walid G. Aref

AI总结:

本文首次实证评估了道路网络中基于机器学习的距离索引,从训练时间、查询延迟、存储和准确性四个维度进行基准测试,并发布开源代码支持后续研究。

摘要:

道路网络中最短路径距离的计算是导航系统、基于位置的服务和空间分析中的核心操作。尽管经典算法,例如Dijkstra算法,可以提供精确答案,但其延迟对于现代实时、大规模部署来说是不可接受的。过去二十年中,已经提出了许多距离索引以加快最短距离查询的处理速度。最近,随着机器学习(ML)的进步,研究者设计并提出了基于ML的距离索引,以高效地回答近似最短路径和距离查询。然而,缺乏对这些ML方法的全面和系统的评估。本文首次对道路网络中的ML基于距离索引进行了实证调查,从四个关键维度评估它们:训练时间、查询延迟、存储和准确性。使用七个真实世界道路网络和从轨迹数据导出的基于工作负载的查询数据集,我们基准测试了十种代表性的ML技术,并将其与强大的经典非ML基线进行比较,突显了关键见解和实际的权衡。我们发布了一个统一的开源代码库,以支持学习距离索引的可重复性和未来研究。

英文摘要:

The calculation of shortest-path distances in road networks is a core operation in navigation systems, location-based services, and spatial analytics. Although classical algorithms, e.g., Dijkstra's algorithm, provide exact answers, their latency is prohibitive for modern real-time, large-scale deployments. Over the past two decades, numerous distance indexes have been proposed to speed up query processing for shortest distance queries. More recently, with advances in machine learning (ML), researchers have designed and proposed ML-based distance indexes to answer approximate shortest path and distance queries efficiently. However, a comprehensive and systematic evaluation of these ML-based approaches is lacking. This paper presents the first empirical survey of ML-based distance indexes on road networks, evaluating them along four key dimensions: training time, query latency, storage, and accuracy. Using 13 real-world road networks (7 with workload-driven queries, derived from trajectory data, and 6 with synthetically generated queries), we benchmark ten representative ML techniques and compare them against classical non-ML baselines, highlighting key insights and practical trade-offs. We release a unified open-source codebase to support reproducibility and future research on learned indexes.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑