arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.03497physics.flu-dyn

不同图像分析技术在密度驱动对流中CO2在水中的pH和碳溶解映射中的比较

A comparison of different image analysis techniques for mapping spatiotemporal pH and carbon dissolution in density-driven convection of CO2 in water

Yao Xu, Marcel Moura, Eirik Grude Flekkøy, Knut Jørgen Måløy

AI总结:

本研究比较了三种图像分析技术,发现色调技术在pH和碳浓度的高分辨率动态测量中表现最稳定和通用。

摘要:

密度驱动对流增强了碳溶解速率,这对于地质碳封存具有重要意义。这一过程还会影地下流体的时空pH值和碳浓度。为了阐明对流机制,了解这些属性在多孔介质中的演变至关重要。然而,在多孔介质中确定时空pH值和浓度始终具有挑战性。本研究采用三种pH指示剂,可追踪pH从4到9.5的广泛范围。此外,我们比较了三种图像处理技术:色调、灰度差和RGB颜色空间的角表示(ϕ,θ)用于量化来自通用pH指示剂的颜色变化,这些变化源于碳对流。所表征的颜色通过校准基准溶液映射到pH。比较结果表明,色调技术量化出的颜色最为稳健,对流体厚度、相机设置和LED亮度具有不变性。在对流实验中,它产生系统中pH和浓度水平的连续空间分布。相反,(ϕ,θ)和灰度差技术对环境变化更敏感。它们在关键范围内pH插值有显著限制,由于其非单调校准路径。尽管所有方法最终产生了相似的总溶解碳估计值,但色调技术在高分辨率动态测量pH和碳浓度的对流实验中提供了更大的稳定性和通用性。

英文摘要:

Density-driven convection enhances the carbon dissolution rate, which is significant for the geological carbon storage. This process will also influence the spatiotemporal pH and carbon concentrations of the underground fluid. To illuminate the convection mechanism, it is critical to understand the evolution of those properties within the porous media. However, determining the spatiotemporal pH and concentration within porous media is always challenging. This study employed a combination of three pH indicators that can track a wide range in pH from 4 to 9.5 in a convection experiment. Furthermore, we compared three image-processing techniques: Hue, gray-difference, and angular representation of RGB color space $\mathbf{(ϕ,θ)}$ for quantifying color changes from the universal $\text{pH}$ indicator arising from the carbon convection. The characterized colors were mapped into pH by calibrating against benchmark solutions. The comparative results demonstrate that the color quantified by the Hue technique is most robust, showing invariance to fluid thickness, camera settings, and LED luminance. In the convection experiments, it produces a continuous spatial distribution of pH and concentration level in the system. In contrast, the $\mathbf{(ϕ,θ)}$ and gray-difference techniques were more sensitive to environmental variations. They also have significant limitations for $\text{pH}$ interpolation in the critical range due to their non-monotonic calibration paths. Although all methods ultimately produced similar estimates of total dissolved carbon, the Hue technique offers greater stability and universality for high-resolution, dynamic measurements of pH and carbon concentration in the convection experiments.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑