arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.03331cs.LG

贝叶斯符合预测作为决策风险问题

Bayesian Conformal Prediction as a Decision Risk Problem

Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester(曼彻斯特大学计算机科学系);UKRI AI Centre for Doctoral Training in Decision Making for Complex Systems(UKRI人工智能博士培训中心(复杂系统决策));Department of Computer Science, Aalto University(艾洛大学计算机科学系);ELLIS Institute, Finland(芬兰ELLIS研究所)

Fanyi Wu, Veronika Lohmanova, Samuel Kaski, Michele Caprio

AI总结:

本文提出贝叶斯符合预测(BCP),通过结合贝叶斯后验预测分布与PAC式符合风险控制,生成具有有限样本覆盖保证的预测集。BCP将符合预测转化为决策风险优化问题,扩展标准固定分位数阈值集为优化最高后验密度(HPD)预测集,提高效率并保持覆盖性。

摘要:

我们提出贝叶斯符合预测(BCP),一种将贝叶斯后验预测分布与PAC式符合风险控制相结合的框架,以生成具有有限样本覆盖保证的预测集。标准分位数阈值符合方法通常使用单一固定阈值构造预测集,通常产生连通的预测集。虽然有效,但当后验预测分布是多模态时,此类集合可能跨越分离模式之间的低密度区域,效率低下。BCP的主要贡献是将符合预测作为决策风险优化问题进行建模,扩展标准固定分位数阈值集为优化最高后验密度(HPD)预测集。这些集合可以是不连通的,将概率质量集中在分离的高密度区域。通过PAC式风险约束来保证有效性,即使贝叶斯模型不正确指定也能提供覆盖控制。在标准嵌套阈值设置中,BCP恢复了最小可行阈值,与现有PAC基于方法一致。在多模态实验中,HPD几何学显著提高了效率,将平均预测集大小从$4.82$降至$2.07$,同时满足目标PAC通过率。在回归、分类和分布偏移实验中,BCP在模型不正确指定下保持可靠覆盖,而贝叶斯可信区间可能无法保持名义覆盖。

英文摘要:

We propose Bayesian Conformal Prediction (BCP), a framework that combines Bayesian posterior predictive distributions with PAC-style conformal risk control to produce prediction sets with finite-sample coverage guarantees. Standard quantile-threshold conformal methods often construct prediction sets using a single fixed threshold, which typically yields connected prediction sets. While valid, such sets can be inefficient when the posterior predictive distribution is multimodal, since they may span low-density regions between separated modes. The main contribution of BCP is to formulate conformal prediction as a decision-risk optimisation problem, extending standard fixed quantile-threshold sets to optimised highest posterior density (HPD) prediction sets. These sets can be disjoint, concentrating probability mass on separated high-density regions. Validity is enforced using a PAC-style risk constraint, which provides coverage control even when the Bayesian model is misspecified. In standard nested-threshold settings, BCP recovers the smallest feasible threshold, aligning with existing PAC-based approaches. In the multimodal experiment, HPD geometry substantially improves efficiency, reducing mean prediction set size from $4.82$ to $2.07$ while satisfying the target PAC pass rate. Across regression, classification, and distribution-shift experiments, BCP maintains reliable coverage under model misspecification, whereas Bayesian credible intervals can fail to preserve nominal coverage.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑