arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.02873cs.CV

ViThinker: 通过动态感知查询实现主动视觉-语言推理

ViThinker: Active Vision-Language Reasoning via Dynamic Perceptual Querying

School of Computing, University of Georgia(计算机学院,佐治亚大学);School of Engineering and Applied Science, Princeton University(工程与应用科学学院,普林斯顿大学)

Weihang You, Qingchan Zhu, David Liu, Yi Pan, Geng Yuan, Hanqi Jiang

AI总结:

ViThinker通过动态感知查询实现主动视觉-语言推理,提升感知基础和推理准确性。

摘要:

链式推理(CoT)在语言模型中表现优异,但在视觉-语言模型中却因过早的视觉到文本转换而遇到困难,这种转换会丢弃诸如几何和空间布局等连续信息。尽管最近的方法通过静态枚举或基于注意力的选择来增强CoT,但它们仍然被动,即处理预计算的输入,而不是主动寻找与任务相关的信息。受人类主动感知的启发,我们引入了ViThinker框架,使视觉-语言模型能够自主生成决策(查询)令牌,以触发专家对齐的视觉特征的合成。ViThinker在训练期间内化了视觉专家的能力,在推理期间进行生成性心理模拟,而无需外部工具调用。通过两阶段课程:首先将冻结的专家知识蒸馏到模型参数中,然后通过稀疏惩罚学习任务驱动的查询,即ViThinker为每个推理步骤发现最小的必要感知。在视觉导向的基准测试中,评估显示了一致的改进,验证了主动查询生成在感知基础和推理准确性方面均优于被动方法。

英文摘要:

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning excels in language models but struggles in vision-language models due to premature visual-to-text conversion that discards continuous information such as geometry and spatial layout. While recent methods enhance CoT through static enumeration or attention-based selection, they remain passive, i.e., processing pre-computed inputs rather than actively seeking task-relevant details. Inspired by human active perception, we introduce ViThinker, a framework that enables vision-language models to autonomously generate decision (query) tokens triggering the synthesis of expert-aligned visual features on demand. ViThinker internalizes vision-expert capabilities during training, performing generative mental simulation during inference without external tool calls. Through a two-stage curriculum: first distilling frozen experts into model parameters, then learning task-driven querying via sparsity penalties, i.e., ViThinker discovers minimal sufficient perception for each reasoning step. Evaluations across vision-centric benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements, validating that active query generation outperforms passive approaches in both perceptual grounding and reasoning accuracy.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑