arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.02784cs.LGcs.AI

跨时间注意力融合(CTAF)用于自监督学习中的多模态生理信号

Cross-Temporal Attention Fusion (CTAF) for Multimodal Physiological Signals in Self-Supervised Learning

HEC Montréal(蒙特利尔高等商学院);Mila-Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute(魁北克人工智能研究所Mila)

Arian Khorasani, Théophile Demazure

AI总结:

CTAF通过时间感知的交叉注意力机制,实现多模态生理信号在自监督学习中的高效融合,提升匹配对的余弦边距和跨模态检索性能,同时保持高准确率并减少标签依赖。

摘要:

我们研究了EEG和外周生理信号异步情况下的多模态情感建模,这在大多数融合方法中被忽略或通过成本高昂的变形处理。我们提出了跨时间注意力融合(CTAF),这是一种自监督模块,学习模态之间的软双向对齐,并利用时间感知的交叉注意力构建稳健的片段嵌入,结合轻量级融合门和对齐正则化的对比目标,可选弱监督。在K-EmoCon数据集上,通过留一法交叉验证评估,CTAF在匹配对的余弦边距和一秒钟内的跨模态令牌检索方面表现更好,并在三个bin准确率和宏F1指标上与基线竞争,同时使用很少的标签。我们的贡献是时间感知的融合机制,直接建模对应关系,一种针对EEG和生理的对齐驱动自监督目标,以及一种衡量对齐质量本身的评估协议。我们的方法考虑了心理生理时间序列中中枢和自主神经系统之间的耦合。这些结果表明,CTAF是朝着在时间异步条件下标签高效、可推广的EEG-外周融合方向迈出的重要一步。

英文摘要:

We study multimodal affect modeling when EEG and peripheral physiology are asynchronous, which most fusion methods ignore or handle with costly warping. We propose Cross-Temporal Attention Fusion (CTAF), a self-supervised module that learns soft bidirectional alignments between modalities and builds a robust clip embedding using time-aware cross attention, a lightweight fusion gate, and alignment-regularized contrastive objectives with optional weak supervision. On the K-EmoCon dataset, under leave-one-out cross-validation evaluation, CTAF yields higher cosine margins for matched pairs and better cross-modal token retrieval within one second, and it is competitive with the baseline on three-bin accuracy and macro-F1 while using few labels. Our contributions are a time-aware fusion mechanism that directly models correspondence, an alignment-driven self-supervised objective tailored to EEG and physiology, and an evaluation protocol that measures alignment quality itself. Our approach accounts for the coupling between the central and autonomic nervous systems in psychophysiological time series. These results indicate that CTAF is a strong step toward label-efficient, generalizable EEG-peripheral fusion under temporal asynchrony.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑