arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.02774cs.CL
收藏

阿姆哈拉语故事问答基准:阿姆哈拉语多文化故事问答基准

AmharicStoryQA: A Multicultural Story Question Answering Benchmark in Amharic

Saarland University(萨尔兰大学);AIMS AMMI;Resonance AI4D Lab(Resonance AI4D实验室);Addis Ababa University(亚的斯亚贝巴大学);HILCOE School of Computer Science and Technology(HILCOE计算机科学与技术学院);University of Hamburg(汉堡大学)

Israel Abebe Azime, Abenezer Kebede Angamo, Hana Mekonen Tamiru, Dagnachew Mekonnen Marilign, Philipp Slusallek, Seid Muhie Yimam, Dietrich Klakow

AI总结:

本文提出AmharicStoryQA基准,通过多文化叙事揭示现有LLMs在叙事理解上的不足,强调文化差异对语言评估的影响。

摘要:

随着对大型语言模型的多语言和文化评估基准日益重视,语言和文化常被视为同义词,性能常被用作模型对给定语言理解的代理。在本工作中,我们主张此类评估忽视了单种语言内部存在的有意义的文化差异。我们通过聚焦埃塞俄比亚不同地区的叙事来填补这一空白,并证明尽管有共享的语言特征,地区特定和领域特定的内容显著影响语言评估结果。为此,我们引入了\textbf{\textit{AmharicStoryQA}},一个基于阿姆哈拉语地区文化多样叙事的长序列故事问答基准。利用此基准,我们揭示了现有LLMs在叙事理解上的显著差距,突显了评估结果中的明显地区差异,并展示了监督微调在不同地区和评估设置中产生的不均衡改进。我们的发现强调了需要文化导向的基准,以超越语言层面的评估,更准确地评估和改进低资源语言的叙事理解。

英文摘要:

With the growing emphasis on multilingual and cultural evaluation benchmarks for large language models, language and culture are often treated as synonymous, and performance is commonly used as a proxy for a models understanding of a given language. In this work, we argue that such evaluations overlook meaningful cultural variation that exists within a single language. We address this gap by focusing on narratives from different regions of Ethiopia and demonstrate that, despite shared linguistic characteristics, region-specific and domain-specific content substantially influences language evaluation outcomes. To this end, we introduce \textbf{\textit{AmharicStoryQA}}, a long-sequence story question answering benchmark grounded in culturally diverse narratives from Amharic-speaking regions. Using this benchmark, we reveal a significant narrative understanding gap in existing LLMs, highlight pronounced regional differences in evaluation results, and show that supervised fine-tuning yields uneven improvements across regions and evaluation settings. Our findings emphasize the need for culturally grounded benchmarks that go beyond language-level evaluation to more accurately assess and improve narrative understanding in low-resource languages.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑