arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.02595cs.CRcs.AIcs.CY
收藏

为抵御网络攻击,我们必须教AI代理黑客

To Defend Against Cyber Attacks, We Must Teach AI Agents to Hack

Monash University(墨尔本大学);University of California, Los Angeles(加州大学洛杉矶分校);University of California, Santa Barbara(加州大学圣巴巴拉分校);National University of Singapore(新加坡国立大学)

Terry Yue Zhuo, Yangruibo Ding, Wenbo Guo, Ruijie Meng

AI总结:

本文主张AI代理驱动的网络攻击不可避免,需转变防御策略,提出构建全面基准、发展训练代理发现漏洞及实施治理限制进攻性AI能力,以负责任地掌握进攻性AI能力作为防御基础设施。

摘要:

在过去的十年里,网络安全一直依赖于人力资源稀缺性,将攻击者限制在手动或大规模的通用自动化攻击上。构建复杂的漏洞利用需要深入的专业知识和手动努力,导致防御者假设对手无法负担大规模定制攻击。AI代理打破了这种平衡,通过在成千上万个目标上自动发现和利用漏洞,仅需小的成功率即可保持盈利。当前的开发者专注于通过数据过滤、安全对齐和输出防护来防止滥用。这些保护措施无法阻止那些控制开放式权重模型、绕过安全控制或独立开发进攻能力的对手。我们主张AI代理驱动的网络攻击是不可避免的,需要在防御策略上进行根本性的转变。在本文中,我们指出现有防御无法阻止适应性对手的原因,并证明防御者必须开发进攻性安全情报。我们提出了三个行动来负责任地构建前沿的进攻性AI能力。首先,构建涵盖完整攻击生命周期的全面基准。其次,从基于工作流的转向训练代理,以在大规模上发现真实世界中的漏洞。第三,实施治理,限制进攻代理仅在经过审计的网络范围内运行,按能力层级逐步发布,并将发现提炼成安全的防御性代理。我们强烈建议将进攻性AI能力视为必要的防御基础设施,因为控制网络安全风险需要在受控环境中掌握它们,而不是让对手先掌握。

英文摘要:

For over a decade, cybersecurity has relied on human labor scarcity to limit attackers to high-value targets manually or generic automated attacks at scale. Building sophisticated exploits requires deep expertise and manual effort, leading defenders to assume adversaries cannot afford tailored attacks at scale. AI agents break this balance by automating vulnerability discovery and exploitation across thousands of targets, needing only small success rates to remain profitable. Current developers focus on preventing misuse through data filtering, safety alignment, and output guardrails. Such protections fail against adversaries who control open-weight models, bypass safety controls, or develop offensive capabilities independently. We argue that AI-agent-driven cyber attacks are inevitable, requiring a fundamental shift in defensive strategy. In this position paper, we identify why existing defenses cannot stop adaptive adversaries and demonstrate that defenders must develop offensive security intelligence. We propose three actions for building frontier offensive AI capabilities responsibly. First, construct comprehensive benchmarks covering the full attack lifecycle. Second, advance from workflow-based to trained agents for discovering in-wild vulnerabilities at scale. Third, implement governance restricting offensive agents to audited cyber ranges, staging release by capability tier, and distilling findings into safe defensive-only agents. We strongly recommend treating offensive AI capabilities as essential defensive infrastructure, as containing cybersecurity risks requires mastering them in controlled settings before adversaries do.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑