arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.02440cs.CL

大语言模型在心理健康领域的应用:多语言评估

Large Language Models for Mental Health: A Multilingual Evaluation

George Mason University(乔治·马歇尔大学);Interdisciplinary School of Doctoral Studies, University of Bucharest(布加勒斯特大学跨学科博士研究学院);PRHLT Research Center, Universitat Politècnica de València(瓦伦西亚理工大学PRHLT研究中心);University of Minnesota(明尼苏达大学)

Nishat Raihan, Sadiya Sayara Chowdhury Puspo, Ana-Maria Bucur, Stevie Chancellor, Marcos Zampieri

AI总结:

本文评估了多语言环境下大语言模型在心理健康任务中的表现,发现其在部分数据集上表现优异,但翻译质量对性能有显著影响。

摘要:

大语言模型(LLMs)在自然语言处理任务中展现出卓越的能力。然而,它们在多语言环境中的表现,尤其是在心理健康领域,尚未得到充分探索。本文评估了专有和开源的LLMs在八种不同语言的心理健康数据集上的表现,以及它们的机器翻译(MT)版本。我们比较了LLMs在零样本、少量样本和微调设置下的表现,与不使用LLMs的传统NLP基线方法。此外,我们评估了不同语言家族和文字类型之间的翻译质量,以了解其对LLMs表现的影响。专有LLMs和微调后的开源LLMs在多个数据集上实现了具有竞争力的F1分数,通常超过了最先进的结果。然而,在MT数据上的表现通常较低,且这种下降的程度因语言和文字类型而异。这种差异突显了LLMs在非英语语言中处理心理健康任务方面的优势,以及当翻译质量引入结构或词汇不匹配时的局限性。

英文摘要:

Large Language Models (LLMs) have remarkable capabilities across NLP tasks. However, their performance in multilingual contexts, especially within the mental health domain, has not been thoroughly explored. In this paper, we evaluate proprietary and open-source LLMs on eight mental health datasets in various languages, as well as their machine-translated (MT) counterparts. We compare LLM performance in zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuned settings against conventional NLP baselines that do not employ LLMs. In addition, we assess translation quality across language families and typologies to understand its influence on LLM performance. Proprietary LLMs and fine-tuned open-source LLMs achieve competitive F1 scores on several datasets, often surpassing state-of-the-art results. However, performance on MT data is generally lower, and the extent of this decline varies by language and typology. This variation highlights both the strengths of LLMs in handling mental health tasks in languages other than English and their limitations when translation quality introduces structural or lexical mismatches.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑