arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.01346cs.AI
收藏

为视觉语言模型选择而基于模型特定任务相似性的层导电性

Model Specific Task Similarity for Vision Language Model Selection via Layer Conductance

School of Computer Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China(计算机科学与技术学院,科学技术大学);School of AI and Data Science, University of Science and Technology of China(人工智能与数据科学学院,科学技术大学)

Wei Yang, Hong Xie, Tao Tan, Xin Li, Defu Lian, Enhong Chen

AI总结:

本文提出了一种基于模型特定任务相似性的视觉语言模型选择方法,通过层导电性分析和方向导电性发散度度量,提升模型选择效果。

摘要:

尽管开源的视觉语言模型(VLMs)已经大量涌现,但为特定下游任务选择最优的预训练模型仍然具有挑战性。由于计算限制和少样本场景中的数据限制,全面评估往往不可行。现有的选择方法未能完全解决这个问题:它们要么依赖于数据密集型代理,要么使用对称的文本描述符,而忽略了转移性本质上是方向性和模型特定的性质。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种框架,该框架将模型选择建立在视觉编码器内部功能动态的基础上。我们的方法通过层级导电性表示每个任务,并通过熵正则化的对齐推导出目标条件下的块重要性分布。在此基础上,我们引入了方向导电性发散度(DCD),一个不对称度量标准,量化了源任务如何有效地覆盖目标的显著功能块。这使得可以通过聚合源任务排名来预测目标模型排名,而无需直接推断。在48个VLMs和21个数据集上的实验结果表明,我们的方法优于最先进的基线方法,在NDCG@5上实现了14.7%的提升。

英文摘要:

While open sourced Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have proliferated, selecting the optimal pretrained model for a specific downstream task remains challenging. Exhaustive evaluation is often infeasible due to computational constraints and data limitations in few shot scenarios. Existing selection methods fail to fully address this: they either rely on data-intensive proxies or use symmetric textual descriptors that neglect the inherently directional and model-specific nature of transferability. To address this problem, we propose a framework that grounds model selection in the internal functional dynamics of the visual encoder. Our approach represents each task via layer wise conductance and derives a target-conditioned block importance distribution through entropy regularized alignment. Building on this, we introduce Directional Conductance Divergence (DCD), an asymmetric metric that quantifies how effectively a source task covers the target's salient functional blocks. This allows for predicting target model rankings by aggregating source task ranks without direct inference. Experimental results on 48 VLMs across 21 datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving a 14.7% improvement in NDCG@5 over SWAB.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑