arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.00992cs.RO
收藏

基于几何感知的黎曼流形上运动规划

Geometry-Aware Sampling-Based Motion Planning on Riemannian Manifolds

Institute for Aerospace Studies, University of Toronto(航空航天研究 institute,多伦多大学)

Phone Thiha Kyaw, Jonathan Kelly

AI总结:

本文提出基于采样的运动规划框架,直接在黎曼流形上操作,利用黎曼几何距离近似和自然梯度引导局部规划,实验证明其在非欧几里得几何下能生成更优轨迹。

摘要:

在许多机器人运动规划问题中,任务目标和物理约束在配置空间上诱导非欧几里得几何,但许多规划器仍使用欧几里得距离忽略此结构。本文解决在配置依赖的黎曼度量下最小化长度的碰撞自由运动规划问题,对应于配置流形上的测地线。传统数值方法在高维系统中扩展性差,而基于采样的规划器则以几何保真度换取扩展性。为弥合这一差距,本文提出一个直接在黎曼流形上操作的基于采样的运动规划框架。我们引入一种计算高效的基于中点的黎曼测地距离近似,并证明其与真实黎曼距离具有三阶精度。基于此近似,我们设计了一个利用黎曼自然梯度引导的局部规划器,以第一阶重新traction追踪流形。在二自由度平面臂和7自由度Franka机械臂下的动能度量,以及在SE(2)刚体规划中的非完整运动约束实验表明,本文方法在非欧几里得几何下 consistently 生成比基于欧几里得的规划器和经典数值测地线求解器基线更低成本的轨迹。

英文摘要:

In many robot motion planning problems, task objectives and physical constraints induce non-Euclidean geometry on the configuration space, yet many planners operate using Euclidean distances that ignore this structure. We address the problem of planning collision-free motions that minimize length under configuration-dependent Riemannian metrics, corresponding to geodesics on the configuration manifold. Conventional numerical methods for computing such paths do not scale well to high-dimensional systems, while sampling-based planners trade scalability for geometric fidelity. To bridge this gap, we propose a sampling-based motion planning framework that operates directly on Riemannian manifolds. We introduce a computationally efficient midpoint-based approximation of the Riemannian geodesic distance and prove that it matches the true Riemannian distance with third-order accuracy. Building on this approximation, we design a local planner that traces the manifold using first-order retractions guided by Riemannian natural gradients. Experiments on a two-link planar arm and a 7-DoF Franka manipulator under a kinetic-energy metric, as well as on rigid-body planning in $\mathrm{SE}(2)$ with non-holonomic motion constraints, demonstrate that our approach consistently produces lower-cost trajectories than Euclidean-based planners and classical numerical geodesic-solver baselines.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑