arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.00366math.OC
收藏

使用强化学习学习安全保证的非贪心控制屏障函数

Learning Safety-Guaranteed, Non-Greedy Control Barrier Functions Using Reinforcement Learning

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign(伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校);Australian Centre for Robotics, The University of Sydney(悉尼大学澳大利亚机器人中心);University of Auckland(奥克兰大学)

Minduli Wijayatunga, Nathan Wallace, Salah Sukkarieh, Roberto Armellin

AI总结:

本文提出一种两阶段强化学习框架,用于学习安全保证的非贪心控制屏障函数,以提高航天器控制的燃料效率和安全性。

摘要:

航天器对接和近距离操作(RPO)对高价值资产构成安全风险,因此需要正式的安全保证。然而,保守的安全控制器会降低任务效率。我们提出了一种统一的两阶段强化学习(RL)框架,以解决输入受限控制屏障函数(ICCBFs)在安全关键、燃料有限的航天器控制中的两个互补限制。给定一个经过认证的安全集S,ICCBFs在输入限制下保证内集C*的前向不变性,但由此产生的每步二次规划(QP)是贪心的,并且在C*内燃料效率低下,而C*外的可恢复状态被保守地丢弃。第一阶段学习状态依赖的类K-无穷参数,以适应ICCBF/CLF衰减率,嵌入长周期成本意识,同时保持C*内的不变性。第二阶段学习残差屏障h_RL(x),以认证S减去C*的子集的可恢复性。在运行时,控制器选择适当的屏障公式(第一阶段或第二阶段)并解决一个轻量的ZOH QP。两个阶段均使用PPO进行训练,使用惩罚约束违规、控制努力和任务指标的奖励。我们评估了三个基准:巡航控制、与旋转目标的航天器对接以及在保持进入和退出区域约束下最大化可观测性的检查。在所有测试案例中,该方法将燃料消耗的中位数相对减少12至25个百分点,并将留在S中的轨迹比例增加7至8个百分点,同时保持实时QP复杂性。

英文摘要:

Spacecraft rendezvous and proximity operations (RPO) pose safety risks to high-value assets, so formal safety guarantees are critical. Yet conservative safety controllers can reduce mission efficiency. We propose a unified two-stage reinforcement learning (RL) framework that addresses two complementary limitations of Input-Constrained Control Barrier Functions (ICCBFs) for safety-critical, fuel-limited spacecraft control. Given a certified safe set S, ICCBFs guarantee forward invariance of an inner set C* under input bounds, but the resulting per-step quadratic programme (QP) is greedy and fuel-inefficient within C*, and recoverable states outside C* are conservatively discarded. Stage 1 learns state-dependent class-K-infinity parameters that adapt ICCBF/CLF decay rates, embedding long-horizon cost awareness while preserving invariance in C*. Stage 2 learns a residual barrier h_RL(x) that certifies recoverability for a subset of S minus C*. At run time, the controller selects the appropriate barrier formulation (Stage 1 or Stage 2) and solves a lightweight ZOH QP. Both stages are trained with PPO using rewards that penalise constraint violations, control effort, and task metrics. We evaluate three benchmarks: cruise control, spacecraft rendezvous with a rotating target, and inspection that maximises observability subject to keep-in and keep-out zone constraints. Across test cases, the method reduces median fuel relative to ICCBF baselines by 12 to 25 percent and increases the fraction of trajectories that remain in S by 7 to 8 percent, while retaining real-time QP complexity.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑