arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2601.22288cs.HCcs.AIeess.ASeess.IV

PersonaCite: 基于VoC的可访谈代理合成AI人设用于可验证的用户与设计研究

PersonaCite: VoC-Grounded Interviewable Agentic Synthetic AI Personas for Verifiable User and Design Research

  • Adobe

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

Mario Truss

更新

AI总结:

PersonaCite通过检索增强的交互,将AI人设作为证据受限的研究工具,提升用户与设计研究中的可验证性与透明度。

AI中文摘要:

基于LLM和代理的合成人设日益被用于设计和产品决策中,但先前研究显示,基于提示的人设往往会产生具有说服力但不可验证的回应,这些回应会掩盖其证据基础。我们提出了PersonaCite,这是一种代理系统,通过检索增强的交互将AI人设重新定义为证据受限的研究工具。与以往依赖提示式角色扮演的方法不同,PersonaCite在每次对话回合中检索实际的客户声音(VoC) artifacts,限制回应到检索到的证据,当证据缺失时明确回避,并提供回应层面的来源归因。通过半结构化访谈和对14名行业专家的部署研究,我们识别了关于感知收益、有效性担忧和设计张力的初步发现,并提出了Persona Provenance Cards作为一种文档模式,用于在以人为核心的设计流程中负责任地使用AI人设。

英文摘要:

LLM-based and agent-based synthetic personas are increasingly used in design and product decision-making, yet prior work shows that prompt-based personas often produce persuasive but unverifiable responses that obscure their evidentiary basis. We present PersonaCite, an agentic system that reframes AI personas as evidence-bounded research instruments through retrieval-augmented interaction. Unlike prior approaches that rely on prompt-based roleplaying, PersonaCite retrieves actual voice-of-customer artifacts during each conversation turn, constrains responses to retrieved evidence, explicitly abstains when evidence is missing, and provides response-level source attribution. Through semi-structured interviews and deployment study with 14 industry experts, we identify preliminary findings on perceived benefits, validity concerns, and design tensions, and propose Persona Provenance Cards as a documentation pattern for responsible AI persona use in human-centered design workflows.

↑