arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2601.15034cs.HCcs.AI

基于大型语言模型的车载对话代理的视觉与认知需求

Visual and Cognitive Demands of a Large Language Model-Powered In-vehicle Conversational Agent

Exponent, Inc.(Exponent公司);Google, Inc.(Google公司)

Chris Monk, Allegra Ayala, Christine S. P. Yu, Gregory M. Fitch, Dara Gruber

AI总结:

本研究评估了基于大型语言模型的车载对话代理在驾驶中的视觉与认知需求,发现其与免提通话在认知负荷上相当,且视觉需求较低,支持其在驾驶环境中的安全应用。

摘要:

驾驶员分心仍然是导致机动车事故的主要原因之一,因此需要严格评估新的车载技术。本研究评估了在道路上驾驶期间,先进的大型语言模型(LLM)对话代理(Gemini Live)所关联的视觉和认知需求,将其与免提电话通话、视觉逐步指导(低负荷基线)以及操作跨度任务(OSPAN)任务(高负荷锚点)进行了比较。32名持证驾驶员在完成五个次要任务时,通过检测反应任务(DRT)测量认知负荷,通过眼动追踪测量视觉注意力,并通过主观工作负荷评分进行评估。结果表明,Gemini Live交互(单轮和多轮)和免提电话通话在认知负荷上具有相似水平,介于视觉逐步指导和OSPAN之间。探索性分析显示,认知负荷在延长的多轮对话中保持稳定。所有任务的平均注视持续时间均低于已确立的2秒安全阈值,证实了低视觉需求。此外,驾驶员在任务完成期间,持续将更长的注视时间投向道路,特别是在语音交互期间,特别是在短暂离开道路注视设备之后,导致总眼睛离道路时间的发现不具实质性影响。主观评分与客观数据一致,参与者报告Gemini Live的低努力、需求和感知分心。这些发现表明,当通过语音接口实现时,先进的LLM对话代理所施加的认知和视觉需求与已确立的低风险免提基准相当,支持其在驾驶环境中的安全部署。

英文摘要:

Driver distraction remains a leading contributor to motor vehicle crashes, necessitating rigorous evaluation of new in-vehicle technologies. This study assessed the visual and cognitive demands associated with an advanced Large Language Model (LLM) conversational agent (Gemini Live) during on-road driving, comparing it against handsfree phone calls, visual turn-by-turn guidance (low load baseline), and the Operation Span (OSPAN) task (high load anchor). Thirty-two licensed drivers completed five secondary tasks while visual and cognitive demands were measured using the Detection Response Task (DRT) for cognitive load, eye-tracking for visual attention, and subjective workload ratings. Results indicated that Gemini Live interactions (both single-turn and multi-turn) and hands-free phone calls shared similar levels of cognitive load, between that of visual turn-by-turn guidance and OSPAN. Exploratory analysis showed that cognitive load remained stable across extended multi-turn conversations. All tasks maintained mean glance durations well below the well-established 2-second safety threshold, confirming low visual demand. Furthermore, drivers consistently dedicated longer glances to the roadway between brief off-road glances toward the device during task completion, particularly during voice-based interactions, rendering longer total-eyes-off-road time findings less consequential. Subjective ratings mirrored objective data, with participants reporting low effort, demands, and perceived distraction for Gemini Live. These findings demonstrate that advanced LLM conversational agents, when implemented via voice interfaces, impose cognitive and visual demands comparable to established, low-risk hands-free benchmarks, supporting their safe deployment in the driving environment.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑