arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2601.11044cs.AI

AgencyBench:在100万token现实场景中自主代理的前沿评估

AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World Contexts

SII Open Source(SII开源)

Keyu Li, Junhao Shi, Yang Xiao, Mohan Jiang, Jie Sun, Yunze Wu, Dayuan Fu, Shijie Xia, Xiaojie Cai, Tianze Xu, Weiye Si, Wenjie Li, Dequan Wang, Pengfei Liu

AI总结:

本文提出AgencyBench,通过138个现实场景评估6种核心代理能力,揭示闭源模型在资源效率和反馈修正上的优势,为下一代自主代理的发展提供测试平台。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)基于的自主代理在经济生产中展现出多方面的能力。然而,现有基准测试仍局限于单一代理能力,未能捕捉长期现实场景。此外,依赖人工反馈进行真实任务的评估存在可扩展性瓶颈,阻碍了自动化评估的实施。为此,我们引入AgencyBench,一个基于日常AI使用场景的综合基准测试,评估6种核心代理能力,涵盖32个现实场景,包含138个任务,每个任务需要平均90次工具调用、100万token和数小时的执行时间。为了实现自动化评估,我们采用用户模拟代理提供迭代反馈,并使用Docker沙箱进行视觉和功能评估。实验表明,闭源模型显著优于开源模型(48.4% vs 32.1%)。进一步分析显示,不同模型在资源效率、反馈驱动的自我修正和特定工具使用偏好上存在显著差异。最后,我们研究了代理支架的影响,发现专有模型在其原生生态系统中表现更优(例如Claude-4.5-Opus通过Claude-Agent-SDK),而开源模型在特定执行框架中表现出不同的性能峰值。AgencyBench为下一代代理提供了关键测试平台,强调了模型架构与代理框架协同优化的必要性。我们相信这项工作为自主代理的未来方向提供了新的视角,并在https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/AgencyBench发布了完整的基准测试和评估工具包。

英文摘要:

Large Language Models (LLMs) based autonomous agents demonstrate multifaceted capabilities to contribute substantially to economic production. However, existing benchmarks remain focused on single agentic capability, failing to capture long-horizon real-world scenarios. Moreover, the reliance on human-in-the-loop feedback for realistic tasks creates a scalability bottleneck, hindering automated rollout collection and evaluation. To bridge this gap, we introduce AgencyBench, a comprehensive benchmark derived from daily AI usage, evaluating 6 core agentic capabilities across 32 real-world scenarios, comprising 138 tasks with specific queries, deliverables, and rubrics. These scenarios require an average of 90 tool calls, 1 million tokens, and hours of execution time to resolve. To enable automated evaluation, we employ a user simulation agent to provide iterative feedback, and a Docker sandbox to conduct visual and functional rubric-based assessment. Experiments reveal that closed-source models significantly outperform open-source models (48.4% vs 32.1%). Further analysis reveals significant disparities across models in resource efficiency, feedback-driven self-correction, and specific tool-use preferences. Finally, we investigate the impact of agentic scaffolds, observing that proprietary models demonstrate superior performance within their native ecosystems (e.g., Claude-4.5-Opus via Claude-Agent-SDK), while open-source models exhibit distinct performance peaks, suggesting potential optimization for specific execution frameworks. AgencyBench serves as a critical testbed for next-generation agents, highlighting the necessity of co-optimizing model architecture with agentic frameworks. We believe this work sheds light on the future direction of autonomous agents, and we release the full benchmark and evaluation toolkit at https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/AgencyBench.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑