arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2601.09601cs.CV

迭代微分熵最小化(IDEM)方法用于精细刚性点云配对3D点云配准:聚焦度量

Iterative Differential Entropy Minimization (IDEM) method for fine rigid pairwise 3D Point Cloud Registration: A Focus on the Metric

Department of Engineering, University of Messina(工程学院,墨西拿大学)

Emmanuele Barberi, Felice Sfravara, Filippo Cucinotta

AI总结:

IDEM方法通过微分熵度量提升点云配准的鲁棒性,有效应对密度差异、噪声和部分重叠等挑战。

摘要:

点云配准是计算机视觉中的核心主题,对齐算法不断改进以提高鲁棒性。常用方法计算点云之间的欧几里得距离并最小化目标函数,如均方根误差(RMSE)。然而,这些方法在点云对齐良好时效果最佳,而密度差异、噪声、孔洞和有限重叠等问题可能会影响结果。传统方法如迭代最近点(ICP)需要选择一个固定点云,因为欧几里得距离缺乏交换性。当只有一个点云存在问题时可以进行调整,但在实际情况下,两个点云都可能受影响,通常需要预处理。作者提出了一种基于微分熵的新度量方法,作为优化框架中用于精细刚性点云配对的优化目标函数,称为迭代微分熵最小化(IDEM)。该度量不依赖于固定点云的选择,在变换过程中揭示了清晰的最小值,对应最佳对齐。进行了多个案例研究,并将结果与使用RMSE、费舍尔距离和哈斯德尔夫距离得到的结果进行比较。所提出的方法在密度差异、噪声、孔洞和部分重叠情况下证明有效,而RMSE并不总能得到最佳对齐。

英文摘要:

Point cloud registration is a central theme in computer vision, with alignment algorithms continuously improving for greater robustness. Commonly used methods evaluate Euclidean distances between point clouds and minimize an objective function, such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). However, these approaches are most effective when the point clouds are well-prealigned and issues such as differences in density, noise, holes, and limited overlap can compromise the results. Traditional methods, such as Iterative Closest Point (ICP), require choosing one point cloud as fixed, since Euclidean distances lack commutativity. When only one point cloud has issues, adjustments can be made, but in real scenarios, both point clouds may be affected, often necessitating preprocessing. The authors introduce a novel differential entropy-based metric, designed to serve as the objective function within an optimization framework for fine rigid pairwise 3D point cloud registration, denoted as Iterative Differential Entropy Minimization (IDEM). This metric does not depend on the choice of a fixed point cloud and, during transformations, reveals a clear minimum corresponding to the best alignment. Multiple case studies are conducted, and the results are compared with those obtained using RMSE, Chamfer distance, and Hausdorff distance. The proposed metric proves effective even with density differences, noise, holes, and partial overlap, where RMSE does not always yield optimal alignment.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑