arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2601.07153cs.CLcs.AI

大语言模型能否理解、推理并生成混合语言文本?

Can Large Language Models Understand, Reason About, and Generate Code-Switched Text?

Capital One(第一资本);Stanford University(斯坦福大学);MBZUAI(穆罕默德·本·扎耶德人工智能大学);KAIST(韩国科学技术院);Brown University(布朗大学);NAIST(奈良先端科学技术大学院大学);UC Berkeley(加州大学伯克利分校);SAS Posos;Oracle(甲骨文公司);ITB(万隆理工学院);The Hong Kong Polytechnic University(香港理工大学)
Genta Indra Winata, David Anugraha, Patrick Amadeus Irawan, Anirban Das, Haneul Yoo, Paresh Dashore, Shreyas Kulkarni, Ruochen Zhang, Haruki Sakajo, Frederikus … 展开作者

Genta Indra Winata, David Anugraha, Patrick Amadeus Irawan, Anirban Das, Haneul Yoo, Paresh Dashore, Shreyas Kulkarni, Ruochen Zhang, Haruki Sakajo, Frederikus Hudi, Anaelia Ovalle, Syrielle Montariol, Felix Gaschi, Michael Anugraha, Rutuj Ravindra Puranik, Zawad Hayat Ahmed, Adril Putra Merin, Emmanuele Chersoni

AI总结:

本文通过CodeMixQA基准测试评估大语言模型在理解、推理和生成混合语言文本方面的能力,揭示了模型在混合语言环境中的局限性,并提供了改进多语言LLMs的见解。

摘要:

混合语言现象在多语言交流中普遍存在,但大语言模型(LLMs)在混合语言环境中的鲁棒性仍不够清楚。在本工作中,我们对LLMs在理解、推理和生成混合语言文本方面的能力进行了全面评估。我们引入了CodeMixQA这一新的基准测试,包含高质量的人类注释,由16种多样的平行混合语言语对组成,涵盖多个地理区域和混合语言模式,并包含原始脚本及其转写形式。利用此基准测试,我们分析了LLMs在混合语言问答任务中的推理行为,揭示了模型如何处理和推理混合语言输入。我们进一步对LLMs生成的合成混合语言文本进行了系统评估,重点关注自然性和语义忠实性,并揭示了当前生成能力的关键限制。我们的发现揭示了在混合语言条件下推理和生成的持续挑战,并为构建更健壮的多语言LLMs提供了可行的见解。我们已将数据集和代码作为开源发布。

英文摘要:

Code-switching is a pervasive phenomenon in multilingual communication, yet the robustness of large language models (LLMs) in mixed-language settings remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we present a comprehensive evaluation of LLM capabilities in understanding, reasoning over, and generating code-switched text. We introduce CodeMixQA a novel benchmark with high-quality human annotations, comprising 16 diverse parallel code-switched language-pair variants that span multiple geographic regions and code-switching patterns, and include both original scripts and their transliterated forms. Using this benchmark, we analyze the reasoning behavior of LLMs on code-switched question-answering tasks, shedding light on how models process and reason over mixed-language inputs. We further conduct a systematic evaluation of LLM-generated synthetic code-switched text, focusing on both naturalness and semantic fidelity, and uncover key limitations in current generation capabilities. Our findings reveal persistent challenges in both reasoning and generation under code-switching conditions and provide actionable insights for building more robust multilingual LLMs. We release the dataset and code as open source.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑