arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2601.06666cs.CLcs.AI

InFi-Check: 可解释且细粒度的大型语言模型事实核查

InFi-Check: Interpretable and Fine-Grained Fact-Checking of LLMs

Tsinghua University(清华大学);DeepLang AI;Fudan University(复旦大学)

Yuzhuo Bai, Shuzheng Si, Kangyang Luo, Qingyi Wang, Wenhao Li, Gang Chen, Fanchao Qi, Maosong Sun

AI总结:

InFi-Check通过可控数据合成和细粒度事实核查框架,提升大型语言模型事实性评估的可解释性和准确性。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)经常产生幻觉,但现有的大多数事实核查方法将事实性评估视为二元分类问题,提供有限的可解释性,并未能捕捉到细粒度的错误类型。在本文中,我们介绍了InFi-Check,一种用于可解释且细粒度核查LLM输出的框架。具体来说,我们首先提出了一条受控的数据合成管道,生成高质量的数据,其特征包括显式的证据、细粒度的错误类型标签、说明和修正。基于此,我们进一步构建了大规模训练数据和一个人工验证的基准InFi-Check-FG,用于LLM输出的细粒度事实核查。在这些高质量训练数据的基础上,我们进一步提出了InFi-Checker,它可以联合提供支持证据、分类细粒度的错误类型,并生成说明和修正。实验表明,InFi-Checker在InFi-Check-FG上实现了最先进的性能,并在各种下游任务中表现出强大的泛化能力,显著提高了事实性评估的实用性和可信度。

英文摘要:

Large language models (LLMs) often hallucinate, yet most existing fact-checking methods treat factuality evaluation as a binary classification problem, offering limited interpretability and failing to capture fine-grained error types. In this paper, we introduce InFi-Check, a framework for interpretable and fine-grained fact-checking of LLM outputs. Specifically, we first propose a controlled data synthesis pipeline that generates high-quality data featuring explicit evidence, fine-grained error type labels, justifications, and corrections. Based on this, we further construct large-scale training data and a manually verified benchmark InFi-Check-FG for fine-grained fact-checking of LLM outputs. Building on these high-quality training data, we further propose InFi-Checker, which can jointly provide supporting evidence, classify fine-grained error types, and produce justifications along with corrections. Experiments show that InFi-Checker achieves state-of-the-art performance on InFi-Check-FG and strong generalization across various downstream tasks, significantly improving the utility and trustworthiness of factuality evaluation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑