arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2601.04564cs.SD
收藏

当音调与词语矛盾时:迈向在语音情感识别中抗御语音-语义冲突的鲁棒性

When Tone and Words Disagree: Towards Robust Speech Emotion Recognition under Acoustic-Semantic Conflict

Inclusion AI, Ant Group(Inclusion AI,蚂蚁集团);Shenzhen University(深圳大学)

Dawei Huang, Yongjie Lv, Ruijie Xiong, Chunxiang Jin, Xiaojiang Peng

AI总结:

本文提出FAS框架,通过分离语音和语义路径并引入轻量级注意力模块,解决语音情感识别中的语音-语义冲突问题,在CASE数据集上达到59.38%的准确率。

摘要:

语音情感识别(SER)系统通常假设语音情感与词汇语义是一致的。然而,在现实世界互动中,语音-语义冲突是常见但被忽视的现象,其中由音调传达的情感与 spoken words 的字面意义相矛盾。我们展示,最先进的 SER 模型,包括基于 ASR 的、自监督学习(SSL)方法和音频语言模型(ALMs),在这样的冲突下会因语义偏见或纠缠的语音-语义表示而性能下降。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了融合语音-语义(FAS)框架,该框架明确分离语音和语义路径,并通过一个轻量级、基于查询的注意力模块连接它们。为了实现系统的评估,我们引入了冲突在语音-语义情感(CASE),这是第一个由清晰且可解释的语音-语义冲突主导的、在各种场景中均存在的数据集。广泛的实验表明,FAS 在域内和零样本设置中均优于现有方法。值得注意的是,在 CASE 基准测试中,传统 SER 模型大幅失败,而 FAS 在 59.38% 准确率上设立了新的 SOTA。我们的代码和数据集可在 https://github.com/24DavidHuang/FAS 上获得。

英文摘要:

Speech Emotion Recognition (SER) systems often assume congruence between vocal emotion and lexical semantics. However, in real-world interactions, acoustic-semantic conflict is common yet overlooked, where the emotion conveyed by tone contradicts the literal meaning of spoken words. We show that state-of-the-art SER models, including ASR-based, self-supervised learning (SSL) approaches and Audio Language Models (ALMs), suffer performance degradation under such conflicts due to semantic bias or entangled acoustic-semantic representations. To address this, we propose the Fusion Acoustic-Semantic (FAS) framework, which explicitly disentangles acoustic and semantic pathways and bridges them through a lightweight, query-based attention module. To enable systematic evaluation, we introduce the Conflict in Acoustic-Semantic Emotion (CASE), the first dataset dominated by clear and interpretable acoustic-semantic conflicts in varied scenarios. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FAS consistently outperforms existing methods in both in-domain and zero-shot settings. Notably, on the CASE benchmark, conventional SER models fail dramatically, while FAS sets a new SOTA with 59.38% accuracy. Our code and datasets is available at https://github.com/24DavidHuang/FAS.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑