arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2601.02441cs.CVcs.AI
收藏

理解纯文本推理在盲图像质量评估中的应用

Understanding Pure Textual Reasoning for Blind Image Quality Assessment

Kyoto University(京都大学)

Yuan Li, Shin'ya Nishida

AI总结:

本文从信息流角度探讨文本信息对图像质量预测的贡献,通过对比现有模型与三种文本推理方法,发现文本信息在质量预测中效果有限,但Self-Consistency方法显著缩小了图像与文本预测间的差异。

摘要:

文本推理近年来在盲图像质量评估(BIQA)中被广泛应用。然而,仍不清楚文本信息如何贡献于质量预测以及文本能多大程度代表与评分相关的图像内容。本文从信息流角度出发,通过比较现有BIQA模型与三种设计用于学习图像-文本-评分关系的范式(Chain-of-Thought、Self-Consistency和Autoencoder),探讨这些问题。实验表明,当仅使用文本信息进行预测时,现有模型的评分预测性能显著下降。其中,Chain-of-Thought范式对BIQA性能提升有限,而Self-Consistency范式显著缩小了图像与文本条件预测间的差距,使PLCC/SRCC差异缩小至0.02/0.03。Autoencoder-like范式在缩小图像-文本差距方面效果较弱,但揭示了进一步优化的方向。这些发现为改进BIQA及高层视觉任务的文本推理提供了见解。

英文摘要:

Textual reasoning has recently been widely adopted in Blind Image Quality Assessment (BIQA). However, it remains unclear how textual information contributes to quality prediction and to what extent text can represent the score-related image contents. This work addresses these questions from an information-flow perspective by comparing existing BIQA models with three paradigms designed to learn the image-text-score relationship: Chain-of-Thought, Self-Consistency, and Autoencoder. Our experiments show that the score prediction performance of the existing model significantly drops when only textual information is used for prediction. Whereas the Chain-of-Thought paradigm introduces little improvement in BIQA performance, the Self-Consistency paradigm significantly reduces the gap between image- and text-conditioned predictions, narrowing the PLCC/SRCC difference to 0.02/0.03. The Autoencoder-like paradigm is less effective in closing the image-text gap, yet it reveals a direction for further optimization. These findings provide insights into how to improve the textual reasoning for BIQA and high-level vision tasks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑