arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2601.02410cs.SEcs.AIcs.CYcs.GR
收藏

Vibe-Check协议:量化AI编程中的认知卸载

The Vibe-Check Protocol: Quantifying Cognitive Offloading in AI Programming

The George Washington University(乔治·华盛顿大学)

Aizierjiang Aiersilan

AI总结:

本文提出Vibe-Check协议,通过量化指标评估Vibe Coding在软件工程教学中的效果,探讨其对技能保留和概念理解的影响。

摘要:

将大型语言模型(LLMs)整合到软件工程教育中,推动了

英文摘要:

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into software engineering education has driven the emergence of ``Vibe Coding,'' a paradigm where developers articulate high-level intent through natural language and delegate implementation to AI agents. While proponents argue this approach modernizes pedagogy by emphasizing conceptual design over syntactic memorization, accumulating empirical evidence raises concerns regarding skill retention and deep conceptual understanding. This paper proposes a theoretical framework to investigate the research question: \textit{Is Vibe Coding a better way to learn software engineering?} We posit a divergence in student outcomes between those leveraging AI for acceleration versus those using it for cognitive offloading. To evaluate these educational trade-offs, we propose the \textbf{Vibe-Check Protocol (VCP)}, a systematic benchmarking framework incorporating three quantitative metrics: the \textit{Cold Start Refactor} ($M_{CSR}$) for modeling skill decay; \textit{Hallucination Trap Detection} ($M_{HT}$) based on signal detection theory to evaluate error identification; and the \textit{Explainability Gap} ($E_{gap}$) for quantifying the divergence between code complexity and conceptual comprehension. Through controlled comparisons, VCP aims to provide a quantitative basis for educators to determine the optimal pedagogical boundary: identifying contexts where Vibe Coding fosters genuine mastery and contexts where it introduces hidden technical debt and superficial competence.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑