arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2601.02409eess.IVcs.AIcs.CV

专家引导的可解释少样本学习与主动样本选择用于医学图像分析

Expert-Guided Explainable Few-Shot Learning with Active Sample Selection for Medical Image Analysis

AI Research, Department of Computer Science at University of South Dakota(AI研究、计算机科学系,南达科他大学)

Longwei Wang, Ifrat Ikhtear Uddin, KC Santosh

AI总结:

本文提出专家引导的可解释少样本学习与主动样本选择方法,通过结合放射科定义的感兴趣区域和迭代样本获取,提升医学图像分析的准确性和可解释性。

摘要:

医学图像分析面临两个关键挑战:标注数据稀缺和模型可解释性不足,两者都阻碍了临床AI的部署。少样本学习(FSL)解决了数据限制问题,但缺乏预测的透明性。主动学习(AL)方法优化了数据获取,但忽略了所获取样本的可解释性。我们提出了一种双框架解决方案:专家引导的可解释少样本学习(EGxFSL)和可解释性引导的主动学习(xGAL)。EGxFSL通过基于Grad-CAM的Dice损失将放射科定义的感兴趣区域作为空间监督,与原型分类联合优化,实现可解释的少样本学习。xGAL引入了迭代样本获取,优先考虑预测不确定性与注意力偏差,创建了一个闭环框架,其中可解释性指导训练和样本选择。在BraTS(MRI)、VinDr-CXR(胸部X光)和SIIM-COVID-19(胸部X光)数据集上,我们分别达到了92%、76%和62%的准确率,均优于非引导基线。在严重数据限制下,xGAL仅用680个样本就达到76%的准确率,而随机采样为57%。Grad-CAM可视化显示,引导模型专注于诊断相关区域,其在乳腺超声上的泛化验证证实了跨模态应用的可行性。

英文摘要:

Medical image analysis faces two critical challenges: scarcity of labeled data and lack of model interpretability, both hindering clinical AI deployment. Few-shot learning (FSL) addresses data limitations but lacks transparency in predictions. Active learning (AL) methods optimize data acquisition but overlook interpretability of acquired samples. We propose a dual-framework solution: Expert-Guided Explainable Few-Shot Learning (EGxFSL) and Explainability-Guided AL (xGAL). EGxFSL integrates radiologist-defined regions-of-interest as spatial supervision via Grad-CAM-based Dice loss, jointly optimized with prototypical classification for interpretable few-shot learning. xGAL introduces iterative sample acquisition prioritizing both predictive uncertainty and attention misalignment, creating a closed-loop framework where explainability guides training and sample selection synergistically. On the BraTS (MRI), VinDr-CXR (chest X-ray), and SIIM-COVID-19 (chest X-ray) datasets, we achieve accuracies of 92\%, 76\%, and 62\%, respectively, consistently outperforming non-guided baselines across all datasets. Under severe data constraints, xGAL achieves 76\% accuracy with only 680 samples versus 57\% for random sampling. Grad-CAM visualizations demonstrate guided models focus on diagnostically relevant regions, with generalization validated on breast ultrasound confirming cross-modality applicability.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑