arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2601.00570cs.HC
收藏

用户对基于LLM的认知重评压力聊天机器人的感知:可行性研究

User Perceptions of an LLM-Based Chatbot for Cognitive Reappraisal of Stress: Feasibility Study

King Center on Global Development, Stanford University(斯坦福大学全球发展国王中心);Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto(多伦多大学计算机科学系);Microsoft Research(微软研究院);School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology(佐治亚理工学院互动计算学院)

Ananya Bhattacharjee, Jina Suh, Mohit Chandra, Javier Hernandez

AI总结:

研究基于GPT-4o的聊天机器人在工作场所压力认知重评中的可行性,通过100名员工实验发现其能显著降低压力强度并改善压力心态,但存在脚本化、交互长度和AI共情等设计张力。

摘要:

认知重评是一种经过充分研究的情绪调节策略,帮助个体重新解释压力情境以减轻其影响。许多数字心理健康工具难以支持这一过程,因为僵化的脚本无法适应用户自然描述压力的方式。本研究考察了基于LLM的单次干预(SSI)用于工作场所压力重评的可行性。我们评估了压力相关结果的短期变化,并检查了使用过程中的设计张力。我们对一家大型科技公司的100名员工进行了可行性研究,他们完成了由基于GPT-4o的聊天机器人引导的结构化认知重评会话。前后测量包括感知压力强度、压力心态、感知需求和感知资源。这些结果使用配对Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行多重比较校正分析。我们还使用两个基于RoBERTa的分类器和一个基于LLM的压力评分器,分析了对话四分位数的情感和压力轨迹。开放式回答使用主题分析。结果显示感知压力强度显著降低,压力心态显著改善。感知资源和感知需求的变化趋势符合预期,但未达到统计显著性。自动分析表明,在互动过程中负面情绪和压力持续下降。定性发现表明,参与者重视结构化提示以组织思路、获得视角和感到被认可。参与者还报告了关于脚本化、偏好交互长度和对AI驱动共情的反应的张力。这些发现突显了将LLM整合到工作场所数字心理健康干预中的前景和设计约束。

英文摘要:

Cognitive reappraisal is a well-studied emotion regulation strategy that helps individuals reinterpret stressful situations to reduce their impact. Many digital mental health tools struggle to support this process because rigid scripts fail to accommodate how users naturally describe stressors. This study examined the feasibility of an LLM-based single-session intervention (SSI) for workplace stress reappraisal. We assessed short-term changes in stress-related outcomes and examined design tensions during use. We conducted a feasibility study with 100 employees at a large technology company who completed a structured cognitive reappraisal session delivered by a GPT-4o-based chatbot. Pre-post measures included perceived stress intensity, stress mindset, perceived demand, and perceived resources. These outcomes were analyzed using paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with correction for multiple comparisons. We also examined sentiment and stress trajectories across conversation quartiles using two RoBERTa-based classifiers and an LLM-based stress rater. Open-ended responses were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results showed significant reductions in perceived stress intensity and significant improvements in stress mindset. Changes in perceived resources and perceived demand trended in expected directions but were not statistically significant. Automated analyses indicated consistent declines in negative sentiment and stress over the course of the interaction. Qualitative findings suggested that participants valued the structured prompts for organizing thoughts, gaining perspective, and feeling acknowledged. Participants also reported tensions around scriptedness, preferred interaction length, and reactions to AI-driven empathy. These findings highlight both the promise and the design constraints of integrating LLMs into DMH interventions for workplace settings.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑