arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2512.23940physics.chem-phcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.stat-mech
收藏

评估第一性原理方法在建模水熔化性质中的表现

Assessment of First-Principles Methods in Modeling the Melting Properties of Water

Princeton University(普林斯顿大学);Eastern Institute of Technology(东方理工学院);CIC nanoGUNE BRTA(nanoGUNE应用研究中心);Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science(伊克尔巴斯科克,巴斯克科学基金会)

Yifan Li, Bingjia Yang, Chunyi Zhang, Axel Gomez, Pinchen Xie, Yixiao Chen, Pablo M. Piaggi, Roberto Car

AI总结:

本文评估了不同第一性原理方法在建模水熔化性质中的表现,发现MB-pol与实验一致,而其他方法存在预测偏差。

摘要:

第一性原理模拟在深入理解水的热力学性质方面发挥了关键作用,而基于这些第一性原理数据训练的机器学习势(MLPs)扩展了可访问的性质范围。然而,由于缺乏系统性基准、对MLPs引入的不确定性低估以及对核量子效应(NQEs)的忽视,不同第一性原理方法的能力尚未完全理解。在此,我们通过路径积分分子动力学(PIMD)系统评估第一性原理方法,该方法由基于密度泛函理论(DFT)的SCAN、revPBE0-D3、SCAN0和revPBE-D3泛函,以及MB-pol势训练的Deep Potential(DP)模型驱动。我们发现,MB-pol在所有测试属性中与实验结果定性一致,而四种DFT泛函错误地预测NQEs会提高熔点。SCAN和SCAN0略微低估了水和冰在熔化时的密度变化,而revPBE-D3和revPBE0-D3严重低估了这一变化。此外,SCAN和SCAN0正确预测了最大液态密度出现在熔点以上温度,而revPBE-D3和revPBE0-D3则预测了相反的行为。我们的结果突显了广泛使用的第一性原理方法的局限性,并呼吁对它们在水系统中的预测能力重新评估。

英文摘要:

First-principles simulations have played a crucial role in deepening our understanding of the thermodynamic properties of water, and machine learning potentials (MLPs) trained on these first-principles data widen the range of accessible properties. However, the capabilities of different first-principles methods are not yet fully understood due to the lack of systematic benchmarks, the underestimation of the uncertainties introduced by MLPs, and the neglect of nuclear quantum effects (NQEs). Here, we systematically assess first-principles methods by calculating key melting properties using path integral molecular dynamics (PIMD) driven by Deep Potential (DP) models trained on data from density functional theory (DFT) with SCAN, revPBE0-D3, SCAN0 and revPBE-D3 functionals, as well as from the MB-pol potential. We find that MB-pol is in qualitatively good agreement with the experiment in all properties tested, whereas the four DFT functionals incorrectly predict that NQEs increase the melting temperature. SCAN and SCAN0 slightly underestimate the density change between water and ice upon melting, but revPBE-D3 and revPBE0-D3 severely underestimate it. Moreover, SCAN and SCAN0 correctly predict that the maximum liquid density occurs at a temperature higher than the melting point, while revPBE-D3 and revPBE0-D3 predict the opposite behavior. Our results highlight limitations in widely used first-principles methods and call for a reassessment of their predictive power in aqueous systems.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑