arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2512.19620cs.CLcs.AI
收藏

探索人类和GPT用于摘要评估所用的特征

Exploring the features used for summary evaluation by Human and GPT

Faculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Canada(达尔豪斯大学计算机科学学院);Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Canada(人工智能向量研究所)

Zahra Sadeghi, Evangelos Milios, Frank Rudzicz

AI总结:

本文研究了人类和GPT在摘要评估中使用的特征,并通过统计和机器学习指标发现与人类响应相匹配的特征,同时展示了通过使用人类指标改进GPT判断能力的方法。

摘要:

摘要评估涉及评估生成的摘要是否反映了源文本的主要思想和意义,需要深入理解内容。大型语言模型(LLMs)已被用于自动化此过程,充当评委来评估摘要相对于原文文本。尽管先前研究调查了LLMs与人类响应之间的对齐情况,但尚未充分了解它们在被要求根据特定质量维度评估时所利用的属性或特征,且在评估分数与指标之间的映射方面也缺乏关注。在本文中,我们解决这一问题,并通过研究统计和机器学习指标来发现与人类和生成预训练转换器(GPTs)响应相匹配的特征。此外,我们展示了指导GPTs使用人类使用的指标可以提高它们的判断能力,并使它们更符合人类响应。

英文摘要:

Summary assessment involves evaluating how well a generated summary reflects the key ideas and meaning of the source text, requiring a deep understanding of the content. Large Language Models (LLMs) have been used to automate this process, acting as judges to evaluate summaries with respect to the original text. While previous research investigated the alignment between LLMs and Human responses, it is not yet well understood what properties or features are exploited by them when asked to evaluate based on a particular quality dimension, and there has not been much attention towards mapping between evaluation scores and metrics. In this paper, we address this issue and discover features aligned with Human and Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs) responses by studying statistical and machine learning metrics. Furthermore, we show that instructing GPTs to employ metrics used by Human can improve their judgment and conforming them better with human responses.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑