arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2512.08078cs.IR
收藏

Azure AI Search中检索方法的比较研究

A Comparative Study of Retrieval Methods in Azure AI Search

Qiang Mao, Han Qin, Robert Neary, Charles Wang, Fusheng Wei, Jianping Zhang, Nathaniel Huber-Fliflet

AI总结:

本文比较了Azure AI Search中多种检索方法的性能,旨在提升电子发现中早期案件评估的效率和准确性。

摘要:

越来越多的律师开始从关键词和语义搜索转向更高效的文档审查任务信息检索方式。大型语言模型(LLMs)现在被视为律师可以用来在文档审查过程中用自然语言提问数据以获得准确简洁答案的工具。本研究评估了Microsoft Azure的检索增强生成(RAG)框架中的检索策略,以确定在电子发现(eDiscovery)中有效的早期案件评估(ECA)方法。在ECA中,法律团队在案件开始时分析数据以获得数据的整体理解,并尝试在全面审查之前确定关键事实和风险。在本文中,我们比较了Azure AI Search的关键词、语义、向量、混合和混合-语义检索方法的性能。然后我们展示了每种方法生成的AI响应的准确性、相关性和一致性。法律从业者可以利用本研究的结果来在未来改进他们选择RAG配置的方式。

英文摘要:

Increasingly, attorneys are interested in moving beyond keyword and semantic search to improve the efficiency of how they find key information during a document review task. Large language models (LLMs) are now seen as tools that attorneys can use to ask natural language questions of their data during document review to receive accurate and concise answers. This study evaluates retrieval strategies within Microsoft Azure's Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework to identify effective approaches for Early Case Assessment (ECA) in eDiscovery. During ECA, legal teams analyze data at the outset of a matter to gain a general understanding of the data and attempt to determine key facts and risks before beginning full-scale review. In this paper, we compare the performance of Azure AI Search's keyword, semantic, vector, hybrid, and hybrid-semantic retrieval methods. We then present the accuracy, relevance, and consistency of each method's AI-generated responses. Legal practitioners can use the results of this study to enhance how they select RAG configurations in the future.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑