arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2512.07469cs.CV

VideoCoF:基于时间推理的统一视频编辑

VideoCoF: Unified Video Editing with Temporal Reasoner

University of Technology Sydney(悉尼科技大学);Zhejiang University(浙江大学);HKUST(香港科技大学)

Xiangpeng Yang, Ji Xie, Yiyuan Yang, Yue Ma, Yan Huang, Min Xu, Qiang Wu

AI总结:

VideoCoF通过引入时间推理机制,解决视频编辑中精度与统一性的矛盾,实现无需掩码的精确区域映射和细粒度编辑,验证了方法的高效性与有效性。

摘要:

现有视频编辑方法面临关键权衡:专家模型精度高但依赖任务特定先验如掩码,限制统一性;统一时间上下文学习模型无掩码但缺乏显式空间线索,导致指令到区域映射弱且定位不精确。为解决此冲突,我们提出VideoCoF,一种受链式思维启发的帧链方法。VideoCoF通过强制视频扩散模型先预测推理令牌(编辑区域潜在特征)再生成目标视频令牌,实现“看见、推理、然后编辑”的流程。此显式推理步骤无需用户提供的掩码,同时实现精确的指令到区域对齐和精细视频编辑。此外,我们引入RoPE对齐策略,利用这些推理令牌确保运动对齐并实现训练时长外的长度外推。我们证明,仅需50k视频对的数据成本,VideoCoF在VideoCoF-Bench上达到最先进的性能,验证了我们方法的效率和有效性。我们的代码、权重、数据可在https://github.com/knightyxp/VideoCoF获取。

英文摘要:

Existing video editing methods face a critical trade-off: expert models offer precision but rely on task-specific priors like masks, hindering unification; conversely, unified temporal in-context learning models are mask-free but lack explicit spatial cues, leading to weak instruction-to-region mapping and imprecise localization. To resolve this conflict, we propose VideoCoF, a novel Chain-of-Frames approach inspired by Chain-of-Thought reasoning. VideoCoF enforces a ``see, reason, then edit" procedure by compelling the video diffusion model to first predict reasoning tokens (edit-region latents) before generating the target video tokens. This explicit reasoning step removes the need for user-provided masks while achieving precise instruction-to-region alignment and fine-grained video editing. Furthermore, we introduce a RoPE alignment strategy that leverages these reasoning tokens to ensure motion alignment and enable length extrapolation beyond the training duration. We demonstrate that with a minimal data cost of only 50k video pairs, VideoCoF achieves state-of-the-art performance on VideoCoF-Bench, validating the efficiency and effectiveness of our approach. Our code, weight, data are available at https://github.com/knightyxp/VideoCoF.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑