arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2512.06014cs.CV

基于公开的MIMIC-CXR和NIH-CXR14数据集评估CXR基础模型

Benchmarking CXR Foundation Models With Publicly Available MIMIC-CXR and NIH-CXR14 Datasets

Imperial College London(帝国理工学院伦敦分校)

Jiho Shin, Dominic Marshall, Matthieu Komorowski

AI总结:

本文评估了两种CXR基础模型在不同数据集上的性能,发现MedImageInsight在多数任务表现更优,而CXR-Foundation具有良好的跨数据集稳定性,强调了标准化评估的重要性。

摘要:

近期的基础模型在医学图像表示学习中表现出强劲的性能,但其在不同数据集上的比较行为仍缺乏研究。本文在公开的MIMIC-CR和NIH ChestX-ray14数据集上评估了两个大规模胸片(CXR)嵌入模型(CXR-Foundation(ELIXR v2.0)和MedImageInsight)。每个模型均使用统一的预处理流程和固定的下游分类器进行评估,以确保可重复的比较。我们直接从预训练编码器中提取嵌入,使用多个疾病标签训练轻量级的LightGBM分类器,并报告均AUROC和F1分数及其95%置信区间。MedImageInsight在大多数任务上表现略高,而CXR-Foundation在跨数据集稳定性方面表现强劲。对MedImageInsight嵌入的无监督聚类进一步揭示了与定量结果一致的疾病特异性结构。结果强调了对医学基础模型标准化评估的必要性,并为未来多模态和临床整合研究建立了可重复的基准。

英文摘要:

Recent foundation models have demonstrated strong performance in medical image representation learning, yet their comparative behaviour across datasets remains underexplored. This work benchmarks two large-scale chest X-ray (CXR) embedding models (CXR-Foundation (ELIXR v2.0) and MedImagelnsight) on public MIMIC-CR and NIH ChestX-ray14 datasets. Each model was evaluated using a unified preprocessing pipeline and fixed downstream classifiers to ensure reproducible comparison. We extracted embeddings directly from pre-trained encoders, trained lightweight LightGBM classifiers on multiple disease labels, and reported mean AUROC, and F1-score with 95% confidence intervals. MedImageInsight achieved slightly higher performance across most tasks, while CXR-Foundation exhibited strong cross-dataset stability. Unsupervised clustering of MedImageIn-sight embeddings further revealed a coherent disease-specific structure consistent with quantitative results. The results highlight the need for standardised evaluation of medical foundation models and establish reproducible baselines for future multimodal and clinical integration studies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑