arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2512.03121cs.CRcs.AI

模态迷失:评估基于文本的成员推断攻击在大型多模态模型中的有效性

Lost in Modality: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Text-Based Membership Inference Attacks on Large Multimodal Models

Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology - Information Science(日本科学技术先进研究院-信息科学)

Ziyi Tong, Feifei Sun, Le Minh Nguyen

AI总结:

本文评估了基于文本的成员推断攻击(MIAs)在多模态模型中的有效性,发现其在分布内设置中表现相似,而在分布外设置中视觉输入起到正则化作用,有效掩盖了成员信号。

摘要:

大型多模态语言模型(MLLMs)正在成为越来越多应用中的基础工具。因此,理解这些系统中的训练数据泄漏变得越来越关键。基于对数概率的成员推断攻击(MIAs)已成为评估大型语言模型(LLMs)数据暴露的常用方法,但其在MLLMs中的效果仍不明确。我们首次全面评估了将这些基于文本的MIA方法扩展到多模态设置的效果。在DeepSeek-VL和InternVL模型家族中,我们进行了视觉与文本(V+T)和纯文本(T-only)条件下的实验,结果显示,在分布内设置中,基于logit的MIAs在不同配置中表现相当,略有V+T优势。相反,在分布外设置中,视觉输入起到正则化作用,有效掩盖了成员信号。

英文摘要:

Large Multimodal Language Models (MLLMs) are emerging as one of the foundational tools in an expanding range of applications. Consequently, understanding training-data leakage in these systems is increasingly critical. Log-probability-based membership inference attacks (MIAs) have become a widely adopted approach for assessing data exposure in large language models (LLMs), yet their effect in MLLMs remains unclear. We present the first comprehensive evaluation of extending these text-based MIA methods to multimodal settings. Our experiments under vision-and-text (V+T) and text-only (T-only) conditions across the DeepSeek-VL and InternVL model families show that in in-distribution settings, logit-based MIAs perform comparably across configurations, with a slight V+T advantage. Conversely, in out-of-distribution settings, visual inputs act as regularizers, effectively masking membership signals.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑