arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2512.00007cs.IRcs.AIcs.CL

使用检索增强型大语言模型代理进行长期形式的新冠事实核查

Use of Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model Agent for Long-Form COVID-19 Fact-Checking

New York University, USA(纽约大学);Washington University in St. Louis, USA(华盛顿大学圣路易斯分校);Shanghai University of Sports, China(上海体育大学)

Jingyi Huang, Yuyi Yang, Mengmeng Ji, Charles Alba, Sheng Zhang, Ruopeng An

AI总结:

本文提出SAFE系统,结合大语言模型与检索增强生成技术,有效提升长期新冠虚假信息的事实核查能力。

摘要:

新冠信息泛滥呼吁可扩展的事实核查解决方案,能够准确可靠地处理长篇虚假信息。本研究提出了SAFE(准确事实提取和评估系统),一种结合大语言模型与检索增强生成(RAG)的代理系统,以提高对长期新冠虚假信息的自动化事实核查。SAFE包括两个代理:一个用于声明提取,另一个使用LOTR-RAG进行声明验证,后者利用包含130,000篇新冠研究文献的文献库。增强变体SAFE(LOTR-RAG + SRAG)结合了Self-RAG,通过查询重写优化检索。我们在50篇假新闻文章(2-17页)上评估了这两个系统,这些文章包含246个标注声明(均值=4.922,标准差=3.186),由公共卫生专家标记为真实(14.1%)、部分真实(14.4%)、虚假(27.0%)、部分虚假(2.2%)和误导性(21.0%)。SAFE系统在所有指标上均显著优于基线LLM(p < 0.001)。在一致性(0-1尺度)方面,SAFE(LOTR-RAG)得分为0.629,优于SAFE(+SRAG)(0.577)和基线(0.279)。在主观评估(0-4利克特尺度)中,SAFE(LOTR-RAG)在有用性(3.640)、清晰性(3.800)和真实性(3.526)方面也取得了最高平均评分。添加SRAG略微降低了整体性能,除了在清晰性上略有提升。SAFE通过解决LLM在一致性和可解释性方面的局限性,在长期新冠事实核查中展示了稳健的改进。核心的LOTR-RAG设计比其SRAG增强变体更有效,为可扩展的虚假信息缓解提供了坚实的基础。

英文摘要:

The COVID-19 infodemic calls for scalable fact-checking solutions that handle long-form misinformation with accuracy and reliability. This study presents SAFE (system for accurate fact extraction and evaluation), an agent system that combines large language models with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to improve automated fact-checking of long-form COVID-19 misinformation. SAFE includes two agents - one for claim extraction and another for claim verification using LOTR-RAG, which leverages a 130,000-document COVID-19 research corpus. An enhanced variant, SAFE (LOTR-RAG + SRAG), incorporates Self-RAG to refine retrieval via query rewriting. We evaluated both systems on 50 fake news articles (2-17 pages) containing 246 annotated claims (M = 4.922, SD = 3.186), labeled as true (14.1%), partly true (14.4%), false (27.0%), partly false (2.2%), and misleading (21.0%) by public health professionals. SAFE systems significantly outperformed baseline LLMs in all metrics (p < 0.001). For consistency (0-1 scale), SAFE (LOTR-RAG) scored 0.629, exceeding both SAFE (+SRAG) (0.577) and the baseline (0.279). In subjective evaluations (0-4 Likert scale), SAFE (LOTR-RAG) also achieved the highest average ratings in usefulness (3.640), clearness (3.800), and authenticity (3.526). Adding SRAG slightly reduced overall performance, except for a minor gain in clearness. SAFE demonstrates robust improvements in long-form COVID-19 fact-checking by addressing LLM limitations in consistency and explainability. The core LOTR-RAG design proved more effective than its SRAG-augmented variant, offering a strong foundation for scalable misinformation mitigation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑