arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2511.20344cs.CL
收藏

类比的奇特案例:在大型语言模型中探讨类比推理

The Curious Case of Analogies: Investigating Analogical Reasoning in Large Language Models

Taewhoo Lee, Minju Song, Chanwoong Yoon, Jungwoo Park, Jaewoo Kang

AI总结:

本研究探讨了大型语言模型在类比推理中的能力,发现其在编码和应用高层关系概念方面表现出有限但新兴的能力,揭示了与人类认知的相似性和差距。

摘要:

类比推理是人类认知的核心,是多种智力活动的重要基础。尽管先前的工作表明LLMs能够表示任务模式和表层概念,但尚不清楚这些模型是否能够通过结构化的比较编码高层关系概念,并将其应用于新情境。在本工作中,我们通过比例类比和故事类比来探讨这一基本方面,并识别出三个关键发现。首先,LLMs能够有效编码类比实体之间的底层关系;在正确情况下,属性信息和关系信息会通过中上层传播,而推理失败则反映这些层中缺失的关系信息。其次,与人类不同,LLMs在关系信息缺失时往往难以应对,甚至在尝试将其应用于新实体时也面临困难。在这种情况下,策略性地修补关键标记位置的隐藏表示可以在一定程度上促进信息传递。最后,LLMs在类比推理中的成功标志是类比情境之间的强结构对齐,而失败往往反映对齐的退化或错位。总体而言,我们的发现揭示了LLMs在编码和应用高层关系概念方面表现出新兴但有限的能力,突显了与人类认知的相似之处和差距。

英文摘要:

Analogical reasoning is at the core of human cognition, serving as an important foundation for a variety of intellectual activities. While prior work has shown that LLMs can represent task patterns and surface-level concepts, it remains unclear whether these models can encode high-level relational concepts and apply them to novel situations through structured comparisons. In this work, we explore this fundamental aspect using proportional and story analogies, and identify three key findings. First, LLMs effectively encode the underlying relationships between analogous entities; both attributive and relational information propagate through mid-upper layers in correct cases, whereas reasoning failures reflect missing relational information within these layers. Second, unlike humans, LLMs often struggle not only when relational information is missing, but also when attempting to apply it to new entities. In such cases, strategically patching hidden representations at critical token positions can facilitate information transfer to a certain extent. Lastly, successful analogical reasoning in LLMs is marked by strong structural alignment between analogous situations, whereas failures often reflect degraded or misplaced alignment. Overall, our findings reveal that LLMs exhibit emerging but limited capabilities in encoding and applying high-level relational concepts, highlighting both parallels and gaps with human cognition.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑