arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2511.19065cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG

理解、加速和改进MeanFlow训练

Understanding, Accelerating, and Improving MeanFlow Training

Yonsei University(延世大学);ETH Zurich(苏黎世联邦理工学院);University of Zurich(苏黎世大学);Max Planck ETH CLS(马克斯·普朗克ETH CLS);Google(谷歌)

Jin-Young Kim, Hyojun Go, Lea Bogensperger, Julius Erbach, Nikolai Kalischek, Federico Tombari, Konrad Schindler, Dominik Narnhofer

AI总结:

通过分析瞬时速度与平均速度的相互作用,提出一种加速瞬时速度形成并逐步转移训练重点的有效训练方案,实现更快的收敛和更优的少步生成性能。

摘要:

MeanFlow通过联合学习瞬时速度场和平均速度场,有望在少步内实现高质量生成建模。然而,其底层训练动态仍不清楚。我们分析两种速度之间的相互作用,发现:(i) 建立良好的瞬时速度是学习平均速度的前提;(ii) 当时间间隔较小时,瞬时速度的学习受益于平均速度,但随着间隔增大而退化;(iii) 任务亲和性分析表明,对于一步生成至关重要的大间隔平均速度的平滑学习,依赖于先形成准确的瞬时速度和小间隔平均速度。在这些观察的指导下,我们设计了一种有效的训练方案,加速瞬时速度的形成,然后将重点从短间隔平均速度转移到长间隔平均速度。我们改进的MeanFlow训练实现了更快的收敛和显著更好的少步生成:使用相同的DiT-XL骨干网络,我们的方法在1-NFE ImageNet 256x256上达到了令人印象深刻的FID 2.87,而传统的MeanFlow基线为3.43。或者,我们的方法以2.5倍更短的训练时间或使用更小的DiT-L骨干网络,匹配MeanFlow基线的性能。

英文摘要:

MeanFlow promises high-quality generative modeling in few steps, by jointly learning instantaneous and average velocity fields. Yet, the underlying training dynamics remain unclear. We analyze the interaction between the two velocities and find: (i) well-established instantaneous velocity is a prerequisite for learning average velocity; (ii) learning of instantaneous velocity benefits from average velocity when the temporal gap is small, but degrades as the gap increases; and (iii) task-affinity analysis indicates that smooth learning of large-gap average velocities, essential for one-step generation, depends on the prior formation of accurate instantaneous and small-gap average velocities. Guided by these observations, we design an effective training scheme that accelerates the formation of instantaneous velocity, then shifts emphasis from short- to long-interval average velocity. Our enhanced MeanFlow training yields faster convergence and significantly better few-step generation: With the same DiT-XL backbone, our method reaches an impressive FID of 2.87 on 1-NFE ImageNet 256x256, compared to 3.43 for the conventional MeanFlow baseline. Alternatively, our method matches the performance of the MeanFlow baseline with 2.5x shorter training time, or with a smaller DiT-L backbone.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑