arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2511.17146cs.CV

学习更细致的观察:一种新的实例级损失用于小脑卒中病变分割

Learning to Look Closer: A New Instance-Wise Loss for Small Cerebral Lesion Segmentation

Institute for Anthropomatics and Robotics (IAR), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology(卡尔斯鲁厄理工学院人机交互与机器人研究所 (IAR))

Luc Bouteille, Alexander Jaus, Jens Kleesiek, Rainer Stiefelhagen, Lukas Heine

AI总结:

本文提出CC-DiceCE损失函数,通过实例级评估提升小病变分割检测率,同时保持分割性能,多数据集实验显示其优于现有blob损失。

摘要:

传统医学图像分割损失函数如Dice常因小病变相对体积小而低估小病变。为解决此问题,实例级损失函数被提出以评估每个病变的分割质量。本文引入基于CC-Metrics框架的CC-DiceCE损失函数,并与现有blob损失进行比较。两者均在nnU-Net框架下与DiceCE基线进行基准测试。研究发现,CC-DiceCE损失在提高检测率(召回率)的同时,对分割性能影响较小,尽管存在数据集依赖的精度权衡。进一步的多数据集研究显示,CC-DiceCE总体上优于blob损失。

英文摘要:

Traditional loss functions in medical image segmentation, such as Dice, often under-segment small lesions because their small relative volume contributes negligibly to the overall loss. To address this, instance-wise loss functions and metrics have been proposed to evaluate segmentation quality on a per-lesion basis. We introduce CC-DiceCE, a loss function based on the CC-Metrics framework, and compare it with the existing blob loss. Both are benchmarked against a DiceCE baseline within the nnU-Net framework, which provides a robust and standardized setup. We find that CC-DiceCE loss increases detection (recall) with minimal to no degradation in segmentation performance, though with dataset-dependent trade-offs in precision. Furthermore, our multi-dataset study shows that CC-DiceCE generally outperforms blob loss.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑