arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2511.03328cs.CLcs.AIcs.CVcs.LG
收藏

多模态大语言模型在临床任务中思维模式的基准评测

Benchmarking the Thinking Mode of Multimodal Large Language Models in Clinical Tasks

Bytedance(字节跳动);Peking University(北京大学);The Chinese University of Hong Kong(香港中文大学);The University of Hong Kong(香港大学);Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence(马尔代夫人工智能大学);Stanford University(斯坦福大学);University of Michigan(密歇根大学)

Jindong Hong, Tianjie Chen, Lingjie Luo, Chuanyang Zheng, Ting Xu, Haibao Yu, Jianing Qiu, Qianzhong Chen, Suning Huang, Yan Xu, Yong Gui, Yijun He, Jiankai Sun

AI总结:

本文评测了 Seed1.5-VL 和 Gemini-2.5-Flash 在临床视觉任务中激活思维模式的效果,发现其提升有限,复杂医学任务表现仍不理想,指出需领域数据和更优知识整合方法。

摘要:

多模态大语言模型(MLLMs)研究的一项最新进展是“推理型 MLLMs”的出现,这类模型在标准“非思维模式”之外,还提供了对其内部思维过程(通常称为“思维模式”)的显式控制。这种能力使这些模型能够在生成最终回答之前,进行逐步的内部深思过程。随着这些“双状态”MLLMs 的快速转变和采用,本工作严格评估了这些 MLLMs 增强的推理过程如何影响其在临床任务中的模型性能和可靠性。本文评估了两个领先的 MLLMs——Seed1.5-VL 和 Gemini-2.5-Flash——在医学应用中的主动“思维模式”能力。我们使用 VQA-RAD 和 ROCOv2 数据集评估了它们在四个视觉医学任务上的表现。我们的发现表明,对于大多数任务而言,激活思维模式所带来的改进与非思维模式相比仍然微乎其微。它们在开放式 VQA 和医学图像解读等复杂医学任务上的表现仍然不够理想,这凸显了对领域特定医学数据以及更先进的医学知识整合方法的需求。

英文摘要:

A recent advancement in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) research is the emergence of "reasoning MLLMs" that offer explicit control over their internal thinking processes (normally referred as the "thinking mode") alongside the standard "non-thinking mode". This capability allows these models to engage in a step-by-step process of internal deliberation before generating a final response. With the rapid transition to and adoption of these "dual-state" MLLMs, this work rigorously evaluated how the enhanced reasoning processes of these MLLMs impact model performance and reliability in clinical tasks. This paper evaluates the active "thinking mode" capabilities of two leading MLLMs, Seed1.5-VL and Gemini-2.5-Flash, for medical applications. We assessed their performance on four visual medical tasks using VQA-RAD and ROCOv2 datasets. Our findings reveal that the improvement from activating the thinking mode remains marginal compared to the standard non-thinking mode for the majority of the tasks. Their performance on complex medical tasks such as open-ended VQA and medical image interpretation remains suboptimal, highlighting the need for domain-specific medical data and more advanced methods for medical knowledge integration.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑