arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2510.22768cs.CL

见多识广?评估面向Agent-to-Agent多模态说服的视觉语言模型易受性

Seeing is Believing? Evaluating Vision-Language Model Susceptibility in Agent-to-Agent Multimodal Persuasion

University of California, Los Angeles(加州大学洛杉矶分校);Salesforce AI Research(Salesforce AI研究)

Haoyi Qiu, Yilun Zhou, Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Kung-Hsiang Huang, Jiaxin Zhang, Nanyun Peng, Chien-Sheng Wu

AI总结:

本文研究了在多智能体多模态说服场景中,视觉语言模型对多模态内容的易受性,提出了MMPersuade框架和数据集,通过实验揭示了多模态输入在说服中的优势,以及说服对象的领域和格式依赖性,以及心理策略在不同上下文和模型架构下的效果差异。

摘要:

随着自主代理越来越多地互动,它们不可避免地试图互相影响。尽管先前在纯文本环境下研究了Agent-to-Agent (A2A) 说服的动力学,但视觉语言模型 (VLMs) 的兴起带来了更复杂的挑战:多模态内容传达了更丰富的信息,同时整合了微妙且难以检测的说服线索。为了研究这种易受性,我们提出了MMPersuade,一个统一的框架和数据集用于A2A多模态说服。我们建模了说服者代理(利用图像和心理策略)与说服对象VLM之间的互动。我们的基准涵盖商业、主观和行为,以及对抗性情境,并通过功能调用评估说服,以捕捉超出口头回应的行为变化。在六个VLM上的实验揭示了三个发现:(1)多模态输入在说服中始终优于纯文本说服,原始视觉信号在对抗性情境中独特地增加易受性,通过绕过文本激活的安全防御;(2)说服对象的易受性高度依赖于领域和格式,现实和社区风格的格式在商业情境中驱动易受性,而不同格式在对抗性情境中占主导地位;(3)心理策略的有效性取决于上下文和模型架构,更强大的模型抵抗良性说服,但在对抗性多模态输入下更易受攻击。我们的框架为构建更稳健和对齐的VLMs提供了基础,以在多代理环境中使用。

英文摘要:

As autonomous agents increasingly interact, they inevitably attempt to influence one another. While prior work in text-only settings has explored the dynamics of Agent-to-Agent (A2A) persuasion, the rise of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) introduces a more complex challenge: multimodal content conveys richer information while integrating subtle, hard-to-detect persuasive cues. To study this vulnerability, we present MMPersuade, a unified framework and dataset for A2A multimodal persuasion. We model interactions between a persuader agent, which leverages images and psychological strategies, and a persuadee VLM. Our benchmark spans commercial, subjective and behavioral, and adversarial contexts, and evaluates persuasion via function-calling that capture behavioral shifts beyond verbal responses. Experiments on six VLMs reveal three findings: (1) multimodal inputs consistently outperform text-only persuasion, with raw visual signals uniquely increasing susceptibility in adversarial settings by bypassing text-activated safety defenses; (2) persuadee vulnerability is highly domain- and format-dependent, with realistic and community-style formats driving susceptibility in commercial settings while different formats dominate in adversarial ones; and (3) psychological strategy efficacy varies with context and model architecture, as more capable models resist benign persuasion yet become more susceptible under adversarial multimodal inputs. Our framework provides a foundation for building more robust and aligned VLMs in multi-agent environments.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑